Kevin M Randall wrote:
If the resource is one in which pages are read left to right, then I would probably take the one on the left-hand side as the preferred source. But seeing as the sequence of the two pages is probably arbitrary, I would not object to someone just deciding that "none of the categories is applicable" and simply choosing based on the agency's preferences. If a)-d) don't apply, then isn't this resource pretty much the equivalent of something that could have been presented as tete-beche but instead was put together interleaved? In that case, the spirit behind f) would seem to apply.
Good point. Thanks, Kevin. Heidrun -- --------------------- Prof. Heidrun Wiesenmueller M.A. Stuttgart Media University Wolframstr. 32, 70191 Stuttgart, Germany www.hdm-stuttgart.de/bi
