I wasn't talking about the copyright of theses.

In terms of theses: author cites New York : Harper, c1961

Catalog record reads 264  New York : Harper, [1961]
264  c1961

Thesis advisor checks citation and notes the [1961].
Calls in author.  Our catalog says it was published in 1961, are you sure
you want to keep c1961.
That is what says in the book, says author.
Hmm, says advisor, I wonder why we have [1961] and where did it come from?

AACR2: New York : Harper, c1961

Which one is clearer and not liable to misinterpretation by users
(non-catalogers)?


On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM, J. McRee Elrod <m...@slc.bc.ca> wrote:

> Amy Mercer posted:
>
> >264 #4  $a London; $a Toronto : $b Schott, $c (c)2011
>
> No. Field 264  4 has only $c date.  The publisher may or may not be
> the copright holder.
>
> You do not record a copyright date in 264  1; in the absence of an
> imprint date, you record an inferred imprint date in brackets, i.e.,
> the copyright date in brackets without the copyright symbol. We do not
> record a 264  4 date if the same as 264  1, even if in brackets in 264
> 1.  I agree that the two 264s with the same date looks redundant.  You
> are right to seek a more sensible solution.
>
> We would do this imprint as:
>
> 264  1  $aLondon [England] ;$aToronto [Ontario] : $bSchott,$c[2011]
>
> We always transcribe or supply jurisdiction; since there is a London in
> both Ontario and England that seems particularly important in this
> case.
>
>
>    __       __   J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
>   {__  |   /     Special Libraries Cataloguing   HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
>   ___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
>



-- 
Gene Fieg
Cataloger/Serials Librarian
Claremont School of Theology
gf...@cst.edu

Claremont School of Theology and Claremont Lincoln University do not
represent or endorse the accuracy or reliability of any of the information
or content contained in this forwarded email.  The forwarded email is that
of the original sender and does not represent the views of Claremont School
of Theology or Claremont Lincoln University.  It has been forwarded as a
courtesy for information only.

Reply via email to