Adam said:
>If it is the same work, then you have to decide what the preferred
>title of the work is, and if it is not the same as the manifestation
>you have in hand, then you would add a 240 for the preferred title
>(or 130 if no creator(s)). No relationship designator is needed.
I would substitute "according to present rules you would" for "have
to" above.
Our small library clients would send that record back to us saying the
240 does not appear on the item. The chance of any of them having the
two is very slim, so no need for the 240 to being them together. They
will accept a 246 1 $iOriginally issued as:$a, so that anyone
searching by the original title will find it. Field 246 is indexed in
more ILS than 240. due to the large number of form 240s useless for
access.
Rules are a means to and end, not an end in themselves.
I agree that no relationship designator is appropriate. No 700
duplicating the 100 is needed.
__ __ J. McRee (Mac) Elrod (m...@slc.bc.ca)
{__ | / Special Libraries Cataloguing HTTP://www.slc.bc.ca/
___} |__ \__________________________________________________________
