Hi Iwan, That's a good list of general​ thinks for RDFLib but I was asking for particular things focussed on RDFLib + RDF-star. As a student, Song has to do new investigative things, not just engineering enhancements to something, as useful as they may be.
So let's keep the ptioroty order you've indicated here - I agree with it all: systematic parsers, better tests etc. - but talk again about the RDF-star work. Nick ------- Original Message ------- On Tuesday, August 16th, 2022 at 05:38, Iwan Aucamp <aucam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Nick > > On Wednesday, 10 August 2022 at 06:37:29 UTC+2 ni...@kurrawong.net wrote: > >> If you have a strong request for what he might do - perhaps other format >> conversions or benchmarking of RDFLib's implementation v. others - please le >> me know on this mailing list ASAP. > > Some things which need some attention which may be appropriate: > > - Parsers: we could really do with some other generated parsers (e.g. LARK). > We have quite a few of known problems with the existing parsers, some of them > are captured with > [xfails](https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/runs/7829635644?check_suite_focus=true#step:8:1611), > others with issues. Some are outright problems where we don't accept valid > input but more are cases where we are too lax and accept input that we should > not, these should ideally be fixed by having a fairly lax grammar that we > then actually interpret differently based on laxness, but even just some > basic lark parsers with max strictness next to existing parsers may be a good > start, we could potentially mark them as _private at first until we are clear > on how we want to expose them in the public interface. > - JSON-LD testing: I recently overhauled all official W3C test suites except > JSON-LD, this highlighted some misreporting in previous reports, and it also > provides a much nicer EARL reporting which now runs on every test run and > makes it easier to notice if the report output changes. This is however not > being used for JSON-LD yet, but I also don't think we are running all JSON-LD > tests. We need to improve JSON-LD, and we talked about that in previous > issues, but before we do this I think we need to be very clear on our current > JSON-LD compliance so we can quantify the effect of incorporating pyld. > - JSON-LD support: We need better JSON-LD support, but this is also no small > task, and probably the starting point is the test suite so this is somewhat > stacked on the previous item. > - SPARQL W3C testing: We are not running all tests from the W3C test for > SPARQL, specifically we are [skipping ServiceDescriptionTest and > ProtocolTest](https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/blob/a39d1436e00affc3cba9e903b22700029d8e8163/test/utils/sparql_checker.py#L409-L412), > it would be nice to also run them. > - > [SNYK-PYTHON-RDFLIB-1324490](https://security.snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-PYTHON-RDFLIB-1324490) > vulnerability: we have this issue > ([#1844](https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/issues/1844)) that is a bit of a > impediment to people using RDFLib, may be worth looking at it, we had a PR > (linked in the issue itself), but the PR is a bit hit and miss, it can be > salvaged but it needs quite a bit of work and the problem of URI resolution > is quite broad and should possibly cover things like resolving to filesystem > also so we can use it instead of [URIMapper in our test > suite](https://github.com/RDFLib/rdflib/blob/a39d1436e00affc3cba9e903b22700029d8e8163/test/utils/iri.py#L103) > also. > - Performance testing: It would be nice to have some automated performance > testing that we can run on every PR so we can quantify the performance impact > PRs have. > > Regards > Iwan Aucamp > > -- > http://github.com/RDFLib > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "rdflib-dev" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > [https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/505a1021-557d-4613-8adf-cdb9c2201d4an%40googlegroups.com](https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/505a1021-557d-4613-8adf-cdb9c2201d4an%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer). -- http://github.com/RDFLib --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rdflib-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rdflib-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rdflib-dev/7INiRHhnDOLKu9iEuZqXKhIh8o1D-p_-wSMrEJNyKdYgf9FECl6MIpOo89mMJvm_kAkb_qQCIP6oR1IXLI_R9RewK51nOP0BesObH2HA-aM%3D%40kurrawong.net.
