On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Steve Clement wrote: > Also calling 1.0 stable is a bit "poor" as it seems we haven't tested it > enough :(
i dunno... i've been using 0.13.x since forever, and top of CVS since i gained commit privs... and it's always been stable enough for me. what you're seeing now is a classic problem: few of you tested the 0.13.x code and reported any bugs :) so what are we to do but assume it's stable because it's stable for us? i haven't seen any showstoppers anyhow. -dean _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
