On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Steve Clement wrote:

> Also calling 1.0 stable is a bit "poor" as it seems we haven't tested it
> enough :(

i dunno... i've been using 0.13.x since forever, and top of CVS since i 
gained commit privs... and it's always been stable enough for me.

what you're seeing now is a classic problem:  few of you tested the 0.13.x 
code and reported any bugs :)  so what are we to do but assume it's stable 
because it's stable for us?

i haven't seen any showstoppers anyhow.

-dean


_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

Reply via email to