>>>>> Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote the following on Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:23:01 +0000 (GMT)
> 
> I don't need it mirrored as such, it was a kind of stress test for 
> rdiff-backup. But I think it shows that rdiff-backup may have problems 
> backing up some legitimate directory structures, and that the long path 
> problem is not just theoretical.

Oh I see, I've done something similar on my system and know errors can
be produced.  I'm not sure your example qualifies as a legitimate
directory structure though :-)

I think most people will be fine until their paths reach about 3950
chars.  So I was mainly wondering if it's ok to skip paths longer than
that, or if someone actually has data they want to save in files whose
paths are 5kB long.


-- 
Ben Escoto

Attachment: pgpEcq90fh8BA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

Reply via email to