>>>>> Maarten Bezemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote the following on Fri, 16 Dec 2005 00:56:45 +0100 (CET)
> 
> Which filesystems allocate disk space for an empty file? AFAIK, ext2 only
> uses an entry in the 'directory', but no blocks for contents. So, by just
> not gzipping an empty file, it will probably take less space already.
> 
> I currently use the error_log file as a means to check the result of the
> rdiff-backup run. Attaching the contents of `ls error_log*|tail -n1` to a
> cron email is quite easy, but would give strange results when no error_log
> file was created in the last run.
> While my crude error_log selection line could be adjusted to use e.g. the
> timestamp from the current_mirror file, I really prefer to have all log
> and session files, even if they're empty.

It was a bit more work than I thought, but the patches I just checked
in avoid gzipping 0 length error_log, mirror_metadata,
extended_attributes, and access_control_list files (but all are still
written).

session_statistics files are still written, so if they bug anyone, do
a "rm session_statistics*".

>>>>> "Hans F. Nordhaug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>> wrote the following on Thu, 15 Dec 2005 22:11:12 +0100
>
> > The mirror_metadata file I would want to keep.  However, the
> > development versions use diffs on these files, so they should take up
> > less space than 1.0.x and earlier.
> 
> OK, I'll try the development version. (I'm currently running 1.0.3.)

Sure, but make sure to keep an eye on your backups since the
development version is the development version.


-- 
Ben Escoto

Attachment: pgpR48i9l7PAa.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki

Reply via email to