>>>>> Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote the following on Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:08:34 +0000 (GMT) > Hi Ben, > > > Yes, callbacks may be easier than parsing rdiff-backup output, but > > right now rdiff-backup doesn't support callbacks, and doesn't really > > have a stable API. Aside from the callback issue, I don't see the API > > being much friendlier than spawning an rdiff-backup process. > > If I added them to the code, would you allow me to distribute the > resulting code, to call it rdiff-backup, and would you consider > merging it with your main tree?
You mean adding callbacks? I don't think I would have a problem adding some kind of callback to the main tree. You can of course redistribute rdiff-backup, but in general we'd want to avoid the situation where there are two different programs both called "rdiff-backup 1.2.12" or whatever. -- Ben Escoto
pgpc5lqB3xvAW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
