The rdiff-backup polls has been running for about 2 weeks, and 88 people voted. That's probably enough to close it and discuss the results:
Which aspect of rdiff-backup would you most like improved? ------- 29% Repository editing (removing files/directories, rebuild index) 21% Repository monitoring (track space used, email on failure, etc.) 18% User-friendliness (installation, documentation, error messages, etc.) 17% Other Feature: (spare files, detect moves, preserve atimes, etc.) 9% General speed 4% Disk Usage Aside from the above, what else about rdiff-backup would you like improved? ------- 25% Repository editing (removing files/directories, rebuild index) 23% Repository monitoring (track space used, email on failure, etc.) 19% User-friendliness (installation, documentation, error messages, etc.) 16% Other Feature: (spare files, detect moves, preserve atimes, etc.) 13% General speed 2% Disk Usage How buggy do you find rdiff-backup? ------ 57% Found a few, but nothing serious 36% Bugfree 5% Very buggy Basically, the first choice is the ability to edit a backup repository. The second is better monitoring. Editing seems to be the major concern, since besides being first, monitoring may have just gotten better anyway (with the rdiff-backup-statistics script in 1.1.5, and the nagios plugin by David Kempe and Christian Marie). I'll post a message about that next. -- Ben Escoto
pgpjH8l7I3G6P.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
