On 12/06/2006, at 1:38, Andrew Ferguson wrote:
Jesse Reynolds wrote:Hello Is it a very bad idea to run rdiff-backup version 1.01 and 1.04 together? that is, local machine (client, Mac OS X) runs 1.04 and remote machine (server, Solaris 10) runs 1.01 ? I've just tried backing up the /etc directory from the remote Solaris 10 box and it's changed some directory names.Nope, that's the expected behavior in this case. It's actually rdiff-backup being very smart. See:http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/rdiff-backup-users/2006-05/ msg00063.htmlfor an explanation.
Of course, thank you. I had noticed they were escape codes for the capital chars, and was wondering why. Ta.
I think I'll reformat one firewire drive as UFS so that the backup is easier to browse.
Cheers Jesse Jesse Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] Virtual Artists Pty Ltd - 08 8223 2288 - http://www.va.com.au/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
