On Jan 31, 2009, at 5:42 AM, Patrick Nagel wrote:
I think I will put this change in the 1.3.x branch ... do people
think
this should be a new option? or should we just change the semantics
of
--max-file-size / --min-file-size ? (I'm leaning towards the
latter ...)
I'd prefer the latter. Probably nobody ever wants the current
behaviour, and
thus it would not make sense to offer this as configuration option.
While we're talking about this, I noticed that this function
doesn't do
any special handling for directories... anyone care to comment? I
think
it would be strange to have rdiff-backup exclude a directory
because it
had too many or too few files when using these options.
Indeed, that would be strange. Directories themselves should not be
affected
by the --[min|max]-file-size option at all, imo.
Ok, this is now the behavior in the 1.3.x CVS tree.
Andrew
_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
