Update on my problem. Through the prompting of Kevin Fenzi on the
Bugzilla I filed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486426
I tried "--no-eas", with no go, but mounting NTFS-3G 2009.2.1 with
default options (whatever that is) *and* using "--no-acls" does work.
So, a question: which is better? Should I mount my drive using
"streams_interface=none" and then run rdiff-backup as usual OR mount
with default and use rdiff-backup --no-acls? Are these options
equivalent, or does one neglect information the other doesn't?
Also, for whom is this a "bug" (if a bug at all)? NTFS-3G or
rdiff-backup...or something else entirely?
Thanks,
Matt Thompson
--
Dr Matthew Thompson, NRC Postdoc (Contractor)
Naval Research Laboratory, Code 6189
202-767-2160
_______________________________________________
rdiff-backup-users mailing list at [email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users
Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
