I think rdiff-backup 3 sounds great. > From: "Otto Kekäläinen" <o...@seravo.com> > To: "EricZolf" <ewl+rdiffbac...@lavar.de>, "Andrew Foster" <a...@sol1.com.au> > Cc: "Rdiff Backup" <rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org> > Sent: Friday, 2 August, 2019 8:13:53 PM > Subject: [rdiff-backup-users] Bump major release version for rdiff-backup?
> Hello! > With the adoption of librsync2 the old MD4 hash is no longer supported > and thus a non-backwards compatible change is introduced. All backups > must therefore start from "scratch". > See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776246 > Also, the Python 3 rewrite is a major thing. Therefore I suggest the > next release of rdiff-backup would bump the major version number and > become 2.0.0 (or even 3.0.0 to tribute Python 3). > What do you think? > - Otto > _______________________________________________ > rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users > Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki _______________________________________________ rdiff-backup-users mailing list at rdiff-backup-users@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/rdiff-backup-users Wiki URL: http://rdiff-backup.solutionsfirst.com.au/index.php/RdiffBackupWiki
