@EricZolf I'm confused about how you manage to build the binaries packages (.whl). It's not part of any pipeline so I'm guessing you have compiled them manually ?
-- Patrik Dufresne Service Logiciel inc. http://www.patrikdufresne.com <http://patrikdufresne.com/>/ 514-971-6442 130 rue Doris St-Colomban, QC J5K 1T9 On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 7:18 AM <ewl+rdiffbac...@lavar.de> wrote: > Hi, > > thanks for the flowers but it's team work. > > On 23/11/2019 12:58, Frank Crawford wrote: > > I'll also see if I can push a version to Fedora rawhide over the > > weekend, so you can pull down the current RPM for it. > > That would be great, I'm on Fedora 31. From [1] I think you could close > the Python 2 and the EPEL 8 bug with the next release. > > As a side note, I discovered the 3rd bug about restore-as-of - I haven't > understood at first lecture, need to have a deeper look and perhaps > create an upstream issue... > > >> Remember: it's a beta version, be careful! > >> > >> - if you're confused or not sure, ask on this mailing list > >> - if you find a bug, create an issue on GitHub with rdiff-backup > >> version, OS and its version, command and log with -v9 verbosity. > > > > I think I need to push a couple of small changes to the RPM spec file > > templates to build with SCM, that can wait until I've tested with the > > Fedora build system. > > Yes, I've always had mixed feelings about upstream packages, they can > only be generic, where most distributions actually need specific packages. > > Thanks, Eric > > [1] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rdiff-backup/bugs/# > >
