Hi! Thank you again for your help!
With the "--no-fsync" argument, the backup succeeded after 13 minutes. Cheers, Jonas On 6/1/21 9:53 PM, Jonas Schöpf wrote: > Hi Patrik! > > On 6/1/21 4:48 PM, Patrik Dufresne wrote: >> Hello Jonas, >> >> Welcome to rdiff-backup ! Let me try to help you a bit more with you >> problem. > Thanks :) >> >> First, the first backup always take alot of time because rdiff-backup is >> not like a simple copy and alot of overhead are done in the background >> to put in place the first version of the data. >> >> Second, with your use case of 400GB, I would not expect a very long >> elapsed time for subsequent backup. I have a couple of backups with >> similar size and it roughly takes ~10-20 minutes over the Internet with >> 400Mbps. But you might not have the same setup as I do. >> >> If $HOME and $DRIVE are both local, It's quite simple to narrow the problem. >> >> While running the backup with you command line, you might want to check >> how the IO of your computer behaves. In the command line, try executring >> `iostat -x -m 3` and take a look at the '%util' column. It displays the >> percentage utilisation of the disk. If the value is near 90%, you have >> found the culprit. The IO is your bottleneck. >> >> To help the situation, you might want to run the backup without fsync. >> When Fsync is enabled, it forces the system to wait until the data is >> written to the disk and persisted. For slow drives on USB, it may have a >> huge impact on the performance. So try running rdiff-backup with >> `--no-fsync`. > > Thank you for your help. > Sounds like this is the problem! > > I will try your this tomorrow and report back if it works :) > > Thank you all for your help! > > Cheers, > Jonas > > -- GPG fingerprint: 0BF3 B30B F1D5 6556 795E F68F 8626 F794 FE62 BE1F