On Sunday, October 9, 2011, Andrew Dalke <[email protected]> wrote:
> Interesting observation using RDKit_2011_06_1:
>
>>>> Chem.MolFromSmarts("[$(CH)]")
> [23:15:16] SMARTS Parse Error: syntax error while parsing: [$(CH)_100]
>>>> Chem.MolFromSmarts("CH")
> [23:15:22] SMARTS Parse Error: syntax error while parsing: CH
>>>>
>
> What does that _100 mean in the error message?
>
> I presume it's due to a bug?
It's a bug in the error reporting: the smarts parser does some rewriting of
the input (assigning those labels to recursive smarts so that common
patterns are only matched once) and the error reporting is using that
rewritten text instead of the input text in the error messages.
-greg
>
> Andrew
> [email protected]
>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
> _______________________________________________
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
