Hmm – good question … I don't have that as lumped hydrohphobe. When you look at 
experimental values then you get e.g.:
Exp predACD predChemAxon
Benzene: 2.13 2.22 1.97
Nitrobenzene 1.85 1.95 1.91

So I would agree on the argument. My experience from X-rays is that the major 
interaction I have seen so far was H-acceptor with water or backbone.

For the more complete fdef file – yes that's still on.
Ciao
Nik


From: JP <jeanpaul.ebe...@inhibox.com<mailto:jeanpaul.ebe...@inhibox.com>>
Date: Monday, October 21, 2013 11:17 AM
To: 
"rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
 Discuss" 
<rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>>
Subject: [Rdkit-discuss] Chemistry 101 question...


yo RDKitters,

A quick question about some chemistry found in the RDKit from a computer 
scientist.

Why is the nitro ("Nitro2") group in DATA/BaseFeatures.fdef and 
Contrib/M_Kossner/BaseFeatures_DIP2_NoMicrospecies.fdef specified as 
LumpedHydrophobe?

# nitro groups in the RD code are always: *-[N+](=O)[O-]
DefineFeature Nitro2 [N;D3;+](=O)[O-]
  Family LumpedHydrophobe
  Weights 1.0,1.0,1.0
EndFeature

Why is this a hydrophobe (it looks polar to me)?  Or is this one of the too 
many corner cases?

Also a related question, I seem to recall that at the UGM (over a delicious 
sandwich) there was talk of having a more complete fdef file out-of-the-box - 
is this still on?

Many Thanks Folks,
JP
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to