Michal: from my experience, MMFF in rdkit is slower than UFF (ca. 2x
for my test cases) but converges faster, so in certain cases the
overall execution time (embedding+optimization) won't be much shorter
for UFF. It really depends on what molecules you work on. AFAIK
rdkit's 3d coord generation algorithm was designed for small- to
medium-sized "druglike" molecules, so you may expect it to fail in
areas very far from this territory. For example, it does not work well
for long conjugated oligomers - sometimes it produces molecular knots
instead of straight strands, and is quite slow for large systems.
That's why I switched to CORINA, btw.
Best wishes,
Michal Krompiec
On 5 April 2014 18:05, JP <jeanpaul.ebe...@inhibox.com> wrote:
> I don't know about the "ultimate way": but this works for me (to generate n
> conformers):
>
> writer = Chem.SDWriter('some_file.sdf')
> # add Hydrogens
> molH = Chem.AddHs(mol)
> # create n conformers for molecule
> confIds = AllChem.EmbedMultipleConfs(molH, n)
> # E optimize
> for confId in confIds:
> AllChem.UFFOptimizeMolecule(molH, confId=confId)
> # write to output file
> writer.write(molH, confId=confId)
>
> You should replace the EmbedMultipleConfs with EmbedMolecule if you are only
> interested in generating only one conformer. UFFOptimizeMolecule(...)
> returns an integer, which if 0 tells you the optimization has converged (or
> 1 otherwise).
>
> UFF is significantly faster, and I do not think the results are worse of
> than the ones generated for MMFF. At least for the small molecules I was
> looking at, but I am sure there are exceptions to this. Paolo has done a
> lot of excellent work on the forcefields, and I think the amide and carbonyl
> planarity issues for UFF have now been fixed.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -
> Jean-Paul Ebejer
> Early Stage Researcher
>
>
> On 5 April 2014 13:35, Michał Nowotka <mmm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've found this
>> (http://code.google.com/p/rdkit/wiki/Generating3DCoordinates) wiki page
>> suggesting how to compute 3D coordinates:
>>
>> from rdkit import Chem
>> from rdkit.Chem import AllChem
>>
>>
>>
>> m = Chem.MolFromSmiles('c1ccccc1C(=O)O')
>>
>> AllChem.EmbedMolecule(m)
>> # the molecule now has a crude conformation, clean it up:
>>
>> AllChem.UFFOptimizeMolecule(m)
>>
>> On the other hand, "Getting started document" describes this differently:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> AllChem.EmbedMolecule(m2)
>> AllChem.UFFOptimizeMolecule(m2)
>>
>> In the meantime, someone suggested that I should call:
>>
>>
>> Chem.AddHs(m)
>>
>> Before calculating 3D properties.
>>
>>
>> So what is an ultimate way of doing this? Lets assume I already have rdkit
>> molecule:
>>
>> m = Chem.MolFromSmiles('Cc1ccccc1')
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> or:
>>
>> m = Chem.MolFromMolFile('data/input.mol')
>>
>>
>> what should I do with 'm' to compute 3D coordinates?
>>
>> Also, once we have MMFF implemented in rdkit, is there any benefit of
>> using UFF (apart from maybe backwards compatibility, as this is a new
>> feature)?
>>
>>
>>
>> Is UFF significantly faster then MMFF?
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>
>> Michał Nowotka
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
