Dear Andrew,

Thank you for your quick reply.
I understood it.
It was helpful information for me!
Best regards,
Takayuki

2015年8月1日(土) 16:01 Andrew Dalke <da...@dalkescientific.com>:

> Dear Takayuki,
>
> On Aug 1, 2015, at 3:54 AM, Taka Seri wrote:
> > Why the [MACCSkeys] bit length is not 166 bit ?
> >
>
>   The RDKit MACCS implementation follows the MACCS key assignments, which
> start at 1. MACCS bit 0 is always set to 0, bit 1 corresponds to key 1,
> etc., so key 166 is at bit 166, giving 167 bits in total.
>
> Best regards,
>                                 Andrew
>                                 da...@dalkescientific.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to