Hi Matthew,

Let's keep this off the list until it is solved. Is your RDBASE environment 
variable correctly set?

p.

> On 21 Jun 2017, at 20:59, Matthew Lardy <mla...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Paolo,
> 
> Here are the results from test #5:
> 
> test 5
>     Start 5: testMultiFPB
> 
> 5: Test command: 
> /gne/research/workspace/lardym/rdkit-Release_2017_03_2/build/Code/DataStructs/testMultiFPB
> 5: Test timeout computed to be: 9.99988e+06
> 5: [12:58:03] -----------------------
> 5:  Testing MultiFPBReader basics
> 5: [12:58:03] Finished
> 5: [12:58:03] -----------------------
> 5:  Testing MultiFPBReader Tanimoto
> 5: [12:58:03] Finished
> 5: [12:58:03] -----------------------
> 5:  Testing MultiFPBReader Tversky
> 5: [12:58:03] Finished
> 5: [12:58:03] -----------------------
> 5:  Testing MultiFPBReader contains search
> 5: [12:58:03] Finished
> 5: [12:58:03] -----------------------
> 5:  Testing MultiFPBReader Similarity Threaded
> 5: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'RDKit::BadFileException'
> 5:   what():  BadFileException
> 1/1 Test #5: testMultiFPB .....................***Exception: Other  0.20 sec
> 
> 0% tests passed, 1 tests failed out of 1
> 
> Total Test time (real) =   2.53 sec
> 
> The following tests FAILED:
>           5 - testMultiFPB (OTHER_FAULT)
> 
> 
> Matt
> 
>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Paolo Tosco <paolo.to...@unito.it> wrote:
>> Hi Matthew,
>> 
>> try running a couple of the failing tests in verbose mode:
>> 
>> ctest -I 5,5 -V
>> ctest -I 9,9 -V
>> 
>> I'd also suggest to check that your Boost libraries are in your 
>> LD_LIBRARY_PATH, as you have built your own.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> p.
>> 
>> 
>>> On 06/21/17 19:17, Matthew Lardy wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I'm trying to get a new build for any version of RDKit from 2016_4 to the 
>>> most reccent release.  Everything builds correctly, but when I perform the 
>>> tests each version fails at the same place:
>>> 
>>>         Start   5: testMultiFPB
>>>   5/116 Test   #5: testMultiFPB .......................***Exception: Other  
>>> 0.12 sec
>>>         Start   6: pyBV
>>>   6/116 Test   #6: pyBV ...............................   Passed    3.65 sec
>>>         Start   7: pyDiscreteValueVect
>>>   7/116 Test   #7: pyDiscreteValueVect ................   Passed    2.18 sec
>>>         Start   8: pySparseIntVect
>>>   8/116 Test   #8: pySparseIntVect ....................   Passed    2.41 sec
>>>         Start   9: pyFPB
>>>   9/116 Test   #9: pyFPB ..............................***Failed    2.16 sec
>>> 
>>> So here is what I'm using:
>>> Boost v.1.59
>>> CMake v 3.0.0
>>> Swig v 3.0.8
>>> CentOS 6 (yes, I know, it's terrible to build on)
>>> 
>>> I've looked through the test log, but nothing caught my eye.  Any ideas why 
>>> the testMultiFPB would fail?
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> Matt
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>>> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>> 
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>> 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to