I think they should. Does a ::mol query on the same table parallelize? If
it does but a ::qmol query does not maybe I forgot something in the SQL
function definitions
On Fri, 1 Jun 2018 at 15:43, Brian Cole <col...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> Are SMARTS searches with the ::qmol type supposed to parallelize? They
> don't appear to be either.
>
> -Brian
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 1:46 AM, Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> When the new parallel queries came out I checked that they actually could
>> be used and things seemed fine.
>> The problem (and it's a sizable one) is that parallel queries don't use
>> the index. Until parallel scans using GIST indices work, I don't think this
>> is really going to help much.
>>
>> -greg
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 12:04 AM Brian Cole <col...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> It appears like Postgres 9.6+ supports parallel queries now to
>>> accelerate slow queries:
>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/10/static/parallel-query.html
>>>
>>> Has anyone successfully got this to accelerate substructure queries with
>>> the RDKit Postgres cartridge?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Brian
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
>>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>>> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
