On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 2:12 AM Marco Podda <marcopodda1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> awesome! Just what I was trying to achieve!
>

Great.


>
> Just one additional question, although it's more curiosity than anything.
> I am supposing that if you "lose" the parent molecule, it is not
> possible to go back and retrieve it deterministically from the fragments
> alone. One should just apply BRICSBuild up to some depth and then "assume"
> (or rather, "hope") the original molecule is among the ones that the
> algorithm has recombined. Am I correct?
>

The process is definitely deterministic, so it's not "assume". If you know
the maximum dept that you fragment to, then you know how to ensure a
maximum depth for the rebuilding process. The group of molecules that comes
out of this will contain the input molecule.


> I was thinking about whether there is a particular fragment order that
> could foster the recovery of the original molecule, but that doesn't seem
> to be the case.
> Are you aware of any fragmentation algorithm that is able to go both ways
> (i.e. from the molecule to the fragments, and from the fragments to the
> same molecule)?
>

There is almost certainly a way to implement the BRICS decomposition/build
process such that this is possible, but I'm wondering why you would want
to. It's much easier to just keep the original molecule around with the
fragments.

-greg
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to