On Jan 22, 2020, at 14:12, Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an aside: it's not particularly relevant to this discussion, but I don't 
> understand why the wikipedia page says that the compound is anti-aromatic. I 
> think the standard definition of anti-aromaticity (agrees with the one linked 
> to from the acepentalene page) requires the ring system to have 4n electrons. 
> That definitely doesn't apply here to either the individual rings or the 
> system as a whole. The system as a whole has 10 electrons (4n+2), the 
> individual rings each have 5 (neither aromatic nor anti-aromatic), and the 
> outer envelope has 9 (again, neither aromatic nor anti-aromatic).

Because I didn't know either, I looked into it.

I think that's because (to quote "Towards experimental determination of conical 
intersection properties:a twin state based comparison with bound excited 
states", Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2011,13, 11872–11877 [*] )

> A Hückel MO analysis[21] leads to the conclusion that the ground state of the 
> conjugated tricyclic acepentalene I is a triplet state. DFT calculations 
> corrected this picture and showed a singlet global minimum distorted to C_s 
> symmetry with alternated single and double bonds,[22] which are well 
> described by the Lewis structures A(B,C). According to a B3LYP/6-31G* 
> calculation the lowest triplet state has also a high symmetric C_3v 
> configuration and lies 3.9 kcal/mol above the singlet ground state minimum. 
> Acepentalene I was characterized as an antiaromatic system [23] despite being 
> formally an aromatic 10 electron system: the resonance between each pair of 
> Kekule structures in this case involves only 4 electron pairs of the 
> pentalene fragments and it averts the resonance with the additional fifth 
> electron pair common for both the structures. Such a resonance is described 
> as an anti-combination of two Kekule structures: (A–B), (C–B) and (C–A).

Just need to add B3LYP/6-31G* calculations to RDKit's aromaticity perception 
algorithm and everything will be fine. :)

The "characterized as an antiaromatic system[23]" is "T. K. Zywietz, H. Jiao, 
P. v. R. Schleyer and A. de Meijere, J. Org.Chem., 1998, 63, 3417" at 
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jo980089f .


Cheers,

                                Andrew
                                da...@dalkescientific.com

[*] 
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Shmuel_Zilberg/publication/51175586_Towards_experimental_determination_of_conical_intersection_properties_A_twin_state_based_comparison_with_bound_excited_states/links/561bb5bc08ae6d17308b037f/Towards-experimental-determination-of-conical-intersection-properties-A-twin-state-based-comparison-with-bound-excited-states.pdf



_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to