I agree with Chris here: I don't think you can do this with dot disconnection and that you need to use recursive SMARTS as Chris describes.
A tweak to Chris' answer: if you want the query to look for regioisomers around a phenyl ring you unfortunately need to actually specify the whole ring in order to avoid having the query match a Cl and a Br in different fused rings in some cases. This gets a bit unwieldy: Cl[c;$(c1(Cl)c(Br)cccc1),$(c1(Cl)cc(Br)ccc1),$(c1(Cl)ccc(Br)cc1)] Here's a demo: In [12]: p = Chem.MolFromSmarts('Cl[c;$(c1(Cl)c(Br)cccc1),$(c1(Cl)cc(Br)ccc1),$(c1(Cl)ccc(Br)cc1)]') In [13]: Chem.MolFromSmiles('Clc1c(Br)cccc1').HasSubstructMatch(p) Out[13]: True In [14]: Chem.MolFromSmiles('Clc1cc(Br)ccc1').HasSubstructMatch(p) Out[14]: True In [15]: Chem.MolFromSmiles('Clc1ccc(Br)cc1').HasSubstructMatch(p) Out[15]: True In [16]: Chem.MolFromSmiles('ClC1=CC=CC2=C1C(Br)=CC=C2').HasSubstructMatch(p) Out[16]: False It's harder if you want to actually retrieve the atoms that match the query directly using the SMARTS. Hopefully you're just looking for the match. :-) -greg On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 1:39 PM Chris Earnshaw <cgearns...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > Dot-disconnected fragments are not going to work for this, as you > describe. You need to use recursive SMARTS (see > https://www.daylight.com/dayhtml/doc/theory/theory.smarts.html section > 4.4). Something like: > Clc[$(cBr);$(ccBr);$(cccBr)] > should (I hope!) be a reasonable starting point. > > Chris Earnshaw > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 11:12, Alexis Parenty < > alexis.parenty.h...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> >> Is there a way to get a substructure match of regioisomers using a smarts >> by separating the fragments with “.”: >> >> >> >> The following approach works but is too permissive since it will also >> match structures with a bromide or a chloride linked to a aliphatic >> carbon... >> >> >> [image: image.png] >> >> >> >> mol_smiles_structure = Chem.MolFromSmiles("Clc1cc(Br)ccc1") >> >> mol_smarts_fragment = Chem.MolFromSmarts("c1ccccc1.[Cl].[Br]") >> >> print(mol_smiles_structure.HasSubstructMatch(mol_smarts_fragment)) >> >> ð True >> >> >> >> >> >> mol_smiles_structure = Chem.MolFromSmiles("ClCc1cc(Br)ccc1") >> >> print(mol_smiles_structure.HasSubstructMatch(mol_smarts_fragment)) >> >> ð True >> >> >> >> If I specify that the Br and the Cl need to be attached to an aromatic to >> make it less permissive, it no longer match because I cannot specify that >> the two general aromatics [a] also belong to the benzene ring... (i,e. it >> tries to look for 8 aromatics instead of six...) >> >> mol_smiles_structure = Chem.MolFromSmiles("Clc1cc(Br)ccc1") >> >> mol_smarts_fragment = Chem.MolFromSmarts("c1ccccc1.[a][Cl].[a][Br]") >> >> print(mol_smiles_structure.HasSubstructMatch(mol_smarts_fragment)) >> >> ð False >> >> >> >> Thanks! >> >> Alexis >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Rdkit-discuss mailing list >> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > Rdkit-discuss mailing list > Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Rdkit-discuss mailing list Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss