Oh! I didn't realize atom properties were so cleanly integrated into sdfs.
This is great - I will try things out and hopefully it works smoothly.
Thanks a lot!

On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 8:53 PM Patrick Walters <wpwalt...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Hao,
>
> As a long-time file format geek.  I feel the need to jump into this one.
>
> 1. mol2
> I'm not a fan of using mol2.  AFAIK, there is no definitive documentation
> for the atom typing rules or the aromaticity model.
>
> 2.  sdf
> The RDKit has had a facility for storing atom properties in an SDF since
> 2019.03.1.  This is documented in the "Atom Properties and SDF files"
> section in the RDKit Book.  If I remember correctly, OEChem adopted the
> same scheme.
>
> 3. pqr
> I don't have much experience with this one, but it appears to be derived
> from the pdb format.  As with #4, I don't think the pdb format is
> appropriate for small molecules.
>
> 4. pdbqt
> No, just no.  I really wish the Autodock developers would get rid of pdbqt
> once and for all.  Why would anyone use a small molecule file format that
> throws away bond order information?
>
> Ok, rant complete, I feel better now.  These are my views, your mileage
> may vary.
>
> Pat
>
> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 4:18 PM Hao <shenha...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I was wondering if anyone has worked with file formats that keep track of
>> partial charges that easily interface with rdkit / other programs. I did a
>> little bit of searching and found several ways including 1. mol2 2. sdf
>> storing partial charges as a list in the data field 3. pqr 4. pdbqt.
>>
>> Obviously there are pros and cons to all but I was wondering if there has
>> been a system that has worked particularly well for you. The main things I
>> am looking for in descending order of importance are 1. ease of storage 2.
>> interfacing with rdkit (this could be through file conversions with other
>> software) 3. visualization
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hao
>> _______________________________________________
>> Rdkit-discuss mailing list
>> Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to