Hi Greg – sure. So -

[cid:image001.png@01DA544C.50E20B90]

If I have a V2000 with or without the chiral flag:


  ACCLDraw01312413482D

  8  8  0  0  1  0  0  0  0  0999 V2000
    4.6334   -6.5969    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    5.6563   -6.0064    0.0000 C   0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    6.6791   -6.5969    0.0000 N   0  0  3  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    6.6791   -7.7781    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    5.6563   -8.3686    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    4.6334   -7.7781    0.0000 C   0  0  1  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    5.6563   -4.8257    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    3.6109   -8.3684    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
  1  2  1  0  0  0  0
  3  2  1  0  0  0  0
  4  3  1  0  0  0  0
  5  4  1  0  0  0  0
  1  6  1  0  0  0  0
  6  5  1  0  0  0  0
  2  7  1  1  0  0  0
  6  8  1  1  0  0  0
M  END


  ACCLDraw01312413492D

  8  8  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0999 V2000
    4.6334   -6.5969    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    5.6563   -6.0064    0.0000 C   0  0  2  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    6.6791   -6.5969    0.0000 N   0  0  3  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    6.6791   -7.7781    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    5.6563   -8.3686    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    4.6334   -7.7781    0.0000 C   0  0  1  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    5.6563   -4.8257    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
    3.6109   -8.3684    0.0000 C   0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0  0
  1  2  1  0  0  0  0
  3  2  1  0  0  0  0
  4  3  1  0  0  0  0
  5  4  1  0  0  0  0
  1  6  1  0  0  0  0
  6  5  1  0  0  0  0
  2  7  1  1  0  0  0
  6  8  1  1  0  0  0
M  END


I’d expect the enhanced collections to be output in V3000 format. In this case 
the chiral flag is also set but that’s not a biggy for me. (I wish the chiral 
flag didn’t exist in V3000.)


  ACCLDraw01312413472D

  0  0  0     0  0            999 V3000
M  V30 BEGIN CTAB
M  V30 COUNTS 8 8 0 0 1
M  V30 BEGIN ATOM
M  V30 1 C 4.6334 -6.5969 0 0
M  V30 2 C 5.6563 -6.0064 0 0 CFG=2
M  V30 3 N 6.6791 -6.5969 0 0 CFG=3
M  V30 4 C 6.6791 -7.7781 0 0
M  V30 5 C 5.6563 -8.3686 0 0
M  V30 6 C 4.6334 -7.7781 0 0 CFG=1
M  V30 7 C 5.6563 -4.8257 0 0
M  V30 8 C 3.6109 -8.3684 0 0
M  V30 END ATOM
M  V30 BEGIN BOND
M  V30 1 1 1 2
M  V30 2 1 3 2
M  V30 3 1 4 3
M  V30 4 1 5 4
M  V30 5 1 1 6
M  V30 6 1 6 5
M  V30 7 1 2 7 CFG=1
M  V30 8 1 6 8 CFG=1
M  V30 END BOND
M  V30 BEGIN COLLECTION
M  V30 MDLV30/STEABS ATOMS=(2 2 6)
M  V30 END COLLECTION
M  V30 END CTAB
M  END


  ACCLDraw01312413492D

  0  0  0     0  0            999 V3000
M  V30 BEGIN CTAB
M  V30 COUNTS 8 8 0 0 0
M  V30 BEGIN ATOM
M  V30 1 C 4.6334 -6.5969 0 0
M  V30 2 C 5.6563 -6.0064 0 0 CFG=2
M  V30 3 N 6.6791 -6.5969 0 0 CFG=3
M  V30 4 C 6.6791 -7.7781 0 0
M  V30 5 C 5.6563 -8.3686 0 0
M  V30 6 C 4.6334 -7.7781 0 0 CFG=1
M  V30 7 C 5.6563 -4.8257 0 0
M  V30 8 C 3.6109 -8.3684 0 0
M  V30 END ATOM
M  V30 BEGIN BOND
M  V30 1 1 1 2
M  V30 2 1 3 2
M  V30 3 1 4 3
M  V30 4 1 5 4
M  V30 5 1 1 6
M  V30 6 1 6 5
M  V30 7 1 2 7 CFG=1
M  V30 8 1 6 8 CFG=1
M  V30 END BOND
M  V30 BEGIN COLLECTION
M  V30 MDLV30/STERAC1 ATOMS=(2 6 2)
M  V30 END COLLECTION
M  V30 END CTAB
M  END

Cheers

Nick



From: Greg Landrum <greg.land...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2024 1:45 PM
To: Tomkinson, Nicholas <nick.tomkin...@astrazeneca.com>
Cc: rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Rdkit-discuss] V2000 to V3000 enhanced stereo question

Hi Nick,

Can you provide an example of exactly what you would like to have happen?

-greg


On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:46 PM Tomkinson, Nicholas 
<nick.tomkin...@astrazeneca.com<mailto:nick.tomkin...@astrazeneca.com>> wrote:
I am trying to convert a simple V2000 molfile with or without the chiral flag 
into a V3000 molfile but this does not create an enhanced stereo collection in 
the V3000 molfile. This is a requirement for another application that does not 
handle V2000/V3000 mixtures well. Is there anyway of forcing the writing of the 
enhanced collection in this context?

Thanks

Nick

________________________________

AstraZeneca UK Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales with 
registered number:03674842 and its registered office at 1 Francis Crick Avenue, 
Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0AA.

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient only 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. If they have come to 
you in error, you must not copy or show them to anyone; instead, please reply 
to this e-mail, highlighting the error to the sender and then immediately 
delete the message. For information about how AstraZeneca UK Limited and its 
affiliates may process information, personal data and monitor communications, 
please see our privacy notice at 
www.astrazeneca.com<https://www.astrazeneca.com>
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net>
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss>
________________________________

AstraZeneca UK Limited is a company incorporated in England and Wales with 
registered number:03674842 and its registered office at 1 Francis Crick Avenue, 
Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0AA.

This e-mail and its attachments are intended for the above named recipient only 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. If they have come to 
you in error, you must not copy or show them to anyone; instead, please reply 
to this e-mail, highlighting the error to the sender and then immediately 
delete the message. For information about how AstraZeneca UK Limited and its 
affiliates may process information, personal data and monitor communications, 
please see our privacy notice at 
www.astrazeneca.com<https://www.astrazeneca.com>
_______________________________________________
Rdkit-discuss mailing list
Rdkit-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/rdkit-discuss

Reply via email to