MessageWe all define beta test units differently. For example, with cars, I 
don't buy the first year model so I got the 2001 Prius, but I did trade it in 
for the 2006 because it was an improvement over the earlier models. With 
inverters, I really like my 11 year old Trace SW4048 but wanted to expand my 
system with a batteryless inverter so I got an SMA as they have tens of 
thousands of reliable units in the field. Believe me, I was tempted to buy a 
US-made inverter, but I read too many wrenches' comments about problems and do 
not have the time or money to mess around. Matt's list will be a valuable tool 
for flushing out problems.

Of course you are not going to ask your average customer to try a new inverter 
and sign a waiver or whatever you want to call it. But a lot of customers want 
the latest-and-greatest widget, so be honest with them and tell them that you 
have not installed any or only X number of what they want. For your average 
customers, only sell them reliable equipment backed by reliable companies who 
work with you to solve problems quickly in the customer's favor and not out of 
your pocket.

Regarding manufacturers, I have been general manager of 2 PV factories and I 
know a lot of people in manufacturing of all kinds of products. Almost all the 
techie managers are knowledgeable, dedicated people who really want to make the 
best product. But problems happen. The good news is techie managers are great 
problem solvers. Several wrenches are working with manufacturers and know how 
difficult it is to decide when to pull the trigger to release a new product or 
to shoot it down.

So the next time your customers say they want the latest technology, tell them 
the truth. New products have problems. They can either buy tried-and-true 
reliable equipment or accept the responsibility for trying something new.

Joel Davidson
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tump 
  To: 'RE-wrenches' 
  Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 9:00 AM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Inverters and their Manufacturers


  But seriously, how about getting in writing from the customer that he/she is 
getting the opportunity to use a new inverter design with new features but may 
also have some unknown design issues that could, from time to time, require 
attention?  

  At what point does an inverter, cc or other BOS components become something 
other then a "the latest-and-greatest gadget in the beta-testing process."
  IF we are to install components that have " have some unknown design issues 
that could, from time to time, require attention? "when do we have the 
understanding & the willingness from the manus to be compensated.Do we too sign 
something from the manufacture? Hey no problem I'll travel 200 miles & install 
your product cause you told me it wasn't too reliable.
  I don't think that the issue we are talking about is/ are Bata test 
components.
   You can't tell me that the manufactures have just had isolated incidents of 
product failure that they have chosen to ignore.
  We the installers, are the folks who have our reputations compromised by 
component failures.
  I can't wait for my next customer to hear that they need to sign a paper 
indicating that the products might work , might not, but solar is reaaalllly 
reliable.
  Again I DO NOT put all the blame on the manufactures but having a qc 
guideline not only for installations but warrantee issues.This just might be a 
better way to prevent problems & then to fix issues that arise due to product 
failure in which that both parties agree on.
  What you did w/ Omni is exactly what I am talking about.
  These issues are not new to the industry but getting the manufactures to 
discuss & work on guide lines for testing for failures in the field & 
compensating those individuals that comply  w/ the test process in order to 
address these issues IS!
   NO sarcasm intended.


  -----Original Message-----
  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Joel Davidson
  Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 10:50 AM
  To: RE-wrenches
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Inverters and their Manufacturers


    Not buying equipment that does not work. Excuse my sarcasm, but what a 
concept. How about not pushing manufacturers to release their products 
prematurely? No one on this list would ever do that - more sarcasm.

    But seriously, how about getting in writing from the customer that he/she 
is getting the opportunity to use a new inverter design with new features but 
may also have some unknown design issues that could, from time to time, require 
attention? In conjunction with the customer warning, get the manufacturer's 
cooperation to share call-back and repair or replacement costs. In other words, 
involve your customers who want the latest-and-greatest gadget in the 
beta-testing process.

    Some of you heard this story before, but it is worth repeating. Several 
years ago, I did a project with 250 Omnion inverters. Omnion inverters were not 
very reliable but they were all we had at the time. Infant mortality rate was 
over 6%. The manufacturer blamed the installers and I blamed inadequate factory 
final testing. Hans Myers, Omnion owner, was a good engineer and a reasonable 
guy. He agreed to switch from 8 hours factory burn-in to 3 days burn-in before 
shipping. I agreed to have installers follow a specific installation procedure 
(send for copy off-list) and sign-off on their installation. Infant mortality 
rate dropped to 0%. Lesson learned: work with your suppliers to the benefit of 
your customers and your bottom line.

    Joel Davidson

      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Tump 
      To: 'RE-wrenches' 
      Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 4:34 AM
      Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Iverters and their Manufacturers 
COMPENSATIONcheck list?


      Perhaps this might be an additional reason to really work on the 
installer's guild. 
      If this trend continues (it hasn't changed since the beginning) then we 
as a group might single out one Manu per month & NOT purchases their product. 
      Two things might happen; 
      1)They might then have the time to actually build products that have a 
bit better reliability .
      2) If there is a problem WHEN we start to buy their product the Manu's 
realize WE the installers, who SELL & INSTALL their products  + put food on 
their tables, have THE POWER to affect their bottom line as they do w/ ours due 
to lost opportunity costs &  expenses incurred while replacing faulty equipment.
      Probably wouldn't take too long for one of the manufactures to hear from 
their distributors that they are not selling anything.


      I will NOT say that all the problems are due to Manu's problems.
      I know that I am guilty of not ALWAYS checking the basics & blaming 
things that ARE NOT fault of the Manu's but loose wires that. "I swear I 
checked or my wires never loosened up".
      Many of us have offered suggestions regarding trouble shooting issues in 
the past & Bill B has put together a "installers check list''.How about it 
Bill?, knowing you, this is something you put together back at PVusa oh those 
many years ago
      This could be the start of a way to finally develop a industry wide & 
Manu. accepted check list to properly assess an issue & then the fix.
      How about is you manufactures, think this may be a way to compensate the 
installers that DO have an issue w/ your products & not their installations.
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Parrish
        Sent: Friday, March 27, 2009 5:59 PM
        To: 'RE-wrenches'
        Subject: [RE-wrenches] Iverters and their Manufacturers


        I don't know about the rest of this group, but we have noticed a steady 
increase in inverter warranty calls. It used to be one a year; then things 
started to increase to the point of at least one per-month. In the beginning it 
was the just the GEC-1000s, then the SMA EEPROM debacle, followed by the 
Fronius IG firmware problem, followed by the Xantrex GT "controlled flight into 
terrain". Now both Outback systems we have installed recently have gone down 
(#...@!?*). We are finding that most manufacturers are essentially indifferent 
to installers who are an integral part of their warranty obligation and are 
doing a poor job of supporting installers for a variety of reasons, to wit:



        (1)   Outback will not reimburse installers period. Not for anything 
that they do. They require that equipment be removed and sent to WA for repair 
or replacement, or will ship replacement parts when the problem is obvious, but 
that's it. We have had one repair last month and are facing a second in April. 
We paid extra for the CEC-grade warranty, and I expected more. Based on this 
experience, I will not recommend or sell Outback equipment, until this policy 
changes.

        (2)   Xantrex lost a returned GT inverter! They began dunning us for 
it. We had the RMA on file but didn't bother to write down the tracking number 
from the Xantrex-generated UPS label (what am I going to do with an inverter 
that won't invert?). So not only will they not process our request for 
reimbursement, they "want their inverter back".

        (3)   SMA didn't want to honor payment on a service call for an EEPROM 
swap out, even though I had an email from one of their techies promising just 
that. After I produced the smoking gun, they pointed out that we were about six 
weeks late in sending in the reimbursement paperwork - they weren't going to 
pay us. They've taken a legally defensible position, but it makes for terrible 
public relations.

        (4)   I thought Fronius might the only cowboy wearing a white hat, but 
no. They want us to wait a month before reimbursing not us but our distributor 
who only had the misfortune of selling us bad merchandise. How we manage (and 
when) to get reimbursed from our distributor, only time will tell, but I bet 
they won't cut us a check.



        But I am saving my best story for last.



        (5)   Xantrex II: we had a terrible time getting an XW6048 to work 
properly (the details are unimportant, except to say the design was spot on). I 
made six service calls after installing it last Summer. I did a firmware 
upgrade, tightened even terminal and wiggled every wire I could. I checked the 
module connections and the PV combiner box. We programmed and reprogrammed 
every possible system parameter, to no avail. After about 4 months (5?), I 
refused to make any more service calls without a Xantrex technician at my side, 
and the customer threatened to see an attorney. Xantrex eventually sent a 
technician down to Los Angeles and administered another firmware upgrade and 
the system settled down. Do you think they are willing to pay for any of our 
post-install service calls? 



        I don't switch vendors very often or without good reason, but I don't 
expect to sell another Outback based system, nor do I expect to sell another 
GT. I am trying to convince my salesmen to sell the Sunny Island system over 
the Xantrex XW product (for a number of reasons) even though it is a more 
expensive proposition. 



        Is the following too much to ask for? 



        - Superior, real-time technical support in the field, including 
generation of an RMA on the spot



        - Replacement equipment promptly shipped with prepaid shipping labels 
for the return of the defective item.



        - Receipt of defective equipment by the manufacturer, triggers 
installer payment without the requirement of submitting a separate invoice.



        - Direct payment to company servicing the equipment, within 30 days of 
the service.



        I am not aware of a single Company out there which meets the above four 
criteria, but I haven't looked closely at PVP or some of the others. All other 
things being equal, I would really like to get behind a manufacturer of quality 
inverters who also treats installers as partners in the warranty department, 
and be able to extol their virtues to customers. In the next breath, I will 
patiently explain to the prospective customer the hazards of purchasing an 
inverter from a Company that does not have a sound and equitable warranty 
policy.



        Any thoughts? And let's remember, at least on this list, they are all 
listening.



        - Peter

        Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D., President
        California Solar Engineering, Inc.
        820 Cynthia Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90065
        Ph 323-258-8883, Mobile 323-839-6108, Fax 323-258-8885
        CA Lic. 854779, NABCEP Cert. 031806-26
        [email protected] 





--------------------------------------------------------------------------


      _______________________________________________
      List sponsored by Home Power magazine

      List Address: [email protected]

      Options & settings:
      http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

      List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

      List rules & etiquette:
      www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

      Check out participant bios:
      www.members.re-wrenches.org




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Home Power magazine

  List Address: [email protected]

  Options & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to