Peter and Nick,
I believe the original question related to two different orientations in the same series string. Peter, your response was related to two parallel strings of the same length run into the same inverter. These are two EXTREMELY different scenarios. They have been discussed in detail many times on this forum, but bad information continues to be circulated-predominantly by a variety of inverter manufacturers. Although it may be technically best to put every string, and even every module, on a different inverter to provide best tracking for PV, the realities of the IV curve must be understood. Since IV curve tracers are so expensive, most people have not had the luxury of testing many difference scenarios of arrays as a few of us have had. With crystalline silicon products, strings of the same length (number of modules), that do not experience different shading, will have nearly identical operating voltages regardless of orientation. There will be small differences due to the temperature impact of irradiance. The operating temperature will vary about 3C for every 100W/m^2. This will cause a slight change in operating voltage. However, higher irradiance, which causes a slight depression in voltage due to increased temperature, has a very weak increase in voltage due to irradiance. These are essentially offsetting results, making the max power voltage nearly identical for two identical strings in two different orientations-therefore no problem exists. However, differential shading on two identical strings will always have a significant impact-usually on the string with the most shading-depending on whether the inverter can see both maximum power points or not. Back to the first question from Nick. Many people want to know what happens if you split a single string between two orientations. The first answer is don't ever do it, but the second answer is found in the IV curve. The irradiance will favor one face or the other at different times of the day and year (as in your example). In all cases, the surface with the lowest irradiance will govern the current flowing through the string-meaning the lowest current will always prevail. For two surfaces close together (30 and 45 tilt and same azimuth) the loss will be small-maybe 5-10% annually. If the difference is dramatic-I have seen strings split between east and west faces at a 45 degree tilt angles-the loss can be 80-90% annually. Nick, although you would be breaking the first rule of array design by doing what you suggest, the result will likely be tolerable for this specific example. I would only allow such a situation when all other options of mounting and aesthetics have been exhausted. For example, I would support what you suggest instead of jacking up the 30-degree section of the array to 45-degrees if this is on a prominent roof face that can be seen by the world. Aesthetics needs to take precedence over performance for highly visible applications when other options make the array look like an idiot installed it. If we are going to get PV on as many roofs as possible, it has to look good. Putting up huge billboards on the top of houses that scream "AN IDIOT WHO LOVES SOLAR LIVES HERE", will not help us achieve our goal. As much as my technical side hates to admit it, sometimes performance has to take a back seat to aesthetics-but only if there is no other way. Bill. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Parrish Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:53 PM To: 'RE-wrenches' Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] losses to competing angles in single strings In principle, two strings with different orientations should not be wired in parallel into the same inverter. However, when the mismatch is minor (15 degrees in pitch or 15 degrees in azimuth) there is practically no degradation. Fronius circulated a white paper for a while that argued that their inverters did maximum power point tracking on the string with the greatest irradiance and therefore did an optimum mppt job on the string with the greatest "available power". This part of the argument makes sense. What I have never been clear about is how close to "optimum" this arrangement is (optimum being two separate monitors one for each string). Fronius appears to be backing away from this white paper, as I was told about six months ago from a member of their tech support staff that they recommended two separate inverters. - Peter Peter T. Parrish, Ph.D., President California Solar Engineering, Inc. 820 Cynthia Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90065 CA Lic. 854779, NABCEP Cert. 031806-26 [email protected] Ph 323-258-8883, Mobile 323-839-6108, Fax 323-258-8885 _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Nick Vida Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 6:38 PM To: wrenches Subject: [RE-wrenches] losses to competing angles in single strings hello wrenches. I was wondering if any of you have any data on what the losses would be if you had your string split with 2 different angles, but at the same azimuth. For instance, string of 11 with 8 facing 180 south at 30 degrees, and 3 facing south 180 at 45 degrees. I have heard that the voltages and currents would differ and the IV curve would be inefficient as a string, but I don't know how much of a loss would be expected. thanks in advance, and hopefully I didn't miss anything in the archives. thanks, nick
<<image001.gif>>
_______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: [email protected] Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
