William, No, I mean what is your problem with complying with the request, "Show the number of existing circuits and/or the disconnecting means for panel C". Why not just do that?
Dick --- You wrote: Dick: I too am mystifed. I sent a request for clarification but have not heard back. It may be some kind of power trip as we have been at odds over many issues. I will report back. William Miller Millersolar.com On Dec 11, 2009, at 6:05 PM, [email protected] (Richard L Ratico) wrote: > William, > > No direct specific experience with this, but, respectfully, what is > the problem? > The code sections seem clear and not unreasonable nor arduous. > > Dick Ratico > Solarwind Electric > > > --- You wrote: > Friends: > > > I just received a plan correction for a grid-tie permit application > wherein > the inspector is questioning compliance with section 225. Below is > the > text of the correction notice: > > The existing panel C in the pump house must comply with NEC 225.31. 225.32 > & 225.33. Show the number of existing circuits and/or the > disconnecting > means for panel C. > > Has anyone ever had experience with this section being applied to a > grid-tie system? The inverters will be inside a pump house remote > from the > main residence. > > Thanks in advance. > > William Miller > --- end of quote --- _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home Power magazine List Address: [email protected] Options & settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: www.members.re-wrenches.org
