Robin Hood would tend to agree with Mr. Lafferty [except for the Solar Bully 
part].  Robin Hood is a diplomat.  This approach spelled out below is also 
cheaper than wasting costly arrows anyway.  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Matt Lafferty 
  To: 'RE-wrenches' 
  Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 12:41 PM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Solar rights precedent


  Don't be a Solar Bully! Have the homeowner file for the Zoning Waiver so it 
gets on the City Council (or whatever body) agenda ASAP. Flapping your arms and 
being disgusted with the Planning folks ain't gonna get your project online.

  I don't think we should automatically assume that the building/planning 
department is being evil and call in the AG to "set them straight". Maybe if 
you never want to have a decent working relationship in that town again... I 
would use honey, not donuts, to sniff out what their main objection is. If it 
turns out that it's really just an "architectural preference" issue, then you 
can deal with it thru the Solar Rights angle. If it's a genuine Public Safety 
issue, then deal with it. It could very well be that it is simply a procedural 
step... There is a building-height ordinance after all. If you want to do 
something that is outside the boundaries of the ordinance, then you need to 
apply for a waiver or seek to modify the ordinance. Civics 101. This doesn't 
have to be a stressful thing!

  I have successfully applied for and received several zoning waivers and 
exemptions on behalf of property owners over the years. Yes, it's an extra step 
and, yes, it can be frustrating. Yes, it can cost the property owner some extra 
bucks. Yes, it can take months to go thru the process. Yes, it is VERY doable! 
Be sure to charge the homeowner for your time.

  One example that the AHJ might cite relative Public Safety is Fire Department 
capabilities. Small communities generally do not have the broadest selection of 
fire-fighting equipment on hand... Taller ladders, etc.

  In this case, I would pre-empt the hearing process by checking in with the 
Fire Chief ASAP. Based on the description provided, I suspect that the Fire 
Chief will determine that the extra height won't be an issue since the height 
to access and walking levels are unchanged. (S)he might have an opinion 
relative the arrangement of the roof mounted equipment (see Cal-Fire 
document....), which you can work to accommodate. If you can achieve the 
support of the Public Safety officials, your path to success will be much 
smoother and more certain. Make damned sure you have this endorsement when the 
first hearing comes around! This and a copy of the Solar Rights Law should be 
sufficient to get it approved quickly. If you don't have either of these when 
the hearing comes around, you just might be denied or delayed further. Look 
smart. Be prepared. 

  I would also have the owner double-check their homeowner's insurance policy 
as a precaution. I've seen clauses like, "Common to the surroundings" before. 
If your project on their property creates a situation where their property is 
no longer "common to the surroundings", and they have a casualty, and you 
didn't warn them.....

  Good Luck!
  Solar Janitor


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of William Miller
  Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 10:27 AM
  To: RE-wrenches
  Subject: [RE-wrenches] Solar rights precedent


  Friends:

  We are applying for a building permit in a small coastal community near here 
for a PV system.  The arrays will be on the flat roof of a house that is right 
up against the allowable building height.  The city is requiring that we apply 
for a waiver to exceed the allowed height.  As I read California law, it allows 
public agencies to rule on a permit application only in regards to public 
safety and health issues.  Repeated letters to the city attorney has failed to 
result in how a building height limitation is a mater of public health and 
safety.

  Have any of you successfully fought a building department on this issue?  If 
so, is there any written documentation on the issue that I can use?

  Thanks in advance,

  William Miller



  Please note new e-mail address and domain:

  William Miller 
  Miller Solar
  Voice :805-438-5600
  email: [email protected]
  http://millersolar.com
  License No. C-10-773985




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Home Power magazine

  List Address: [email protected]

  Options & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to