Roof construction knowledge and roofing experience is essential if you are a 
solar designer and installer. You or people you work with must with have roof 
experience. If you do not have an experienced roofer in your organization, then 
you must work closely with an experienced roofing subcontractor (unless you 
like getting angry phone calls when it is raining).

Framing and roofing a standing seam metal roof is not difficult. There is no 
need to guess or to ask inexperienced people what they think should be done. 
Good suppliers will provide specifications, instructions, and drawings and put 
you in touch with experts who can answer your questions.

In 1996, I did the Unisolar standing seam roof at the University of California 
Irvine campus. See http://www.hamcontact.com/unisolar/roofapps.html All we had 
was to start with was a 2nd floor deck and a contract with Southern California 
Edison (SCE) and the DOE UPVG (Utility Photovoltaic Group now called SEPA) who 
cost-shared the 5 kW new roof BIPV system. Unisolar provided standing seam 
metal roofing installation instructions but knew very little about roofing. I 
talked with McElroy, the manufacturer of the roofing Unisolar used for their 
SSR product. I also visited metal roofing jobsites during construction to see 
if anything new had been developed since I last did a metal roof a few years 
before. Then I designed the framing, building attachments, and the PV system 
and got SCE and Campus approval. I was concerned about my attachments to the 
roof deck knee-wall so I asked for the building structural drawings and really 
lucked out. The engineer who had designed the building still worked at his 
nearby office part-time even though he was 85 years old. (This old-timer still 
came to his office in a suit and tie to share his over 50 years of knowledge, 
experience, and wisdom. I love working in the construction industry.) He and I 
spent 15 minutes reviewing my design and he gave it his blessing.

When I designed the solar roof, the University's Combustion Engineering Lab 
Director said that he might want to someday enclose the roof deck so we put in 
metal diagonal straps under the roof panels to brace the roof. The engineer 
said this was a good idea because it strengthened the roof in case of 
earthquakes.

The construction went smoothly. We fastened the ledger and post attachments 
with lag bolts and attached the posts, beams and purlins. The SSR panels were 
laminated at the Unisolar factory and shipped from Troy, Michigan (a waste of 
time and money). When we started fastening the standing seam panels, I had to 
ask the University lab engineers to turn off the experimental natural gas fuel 
cell they were testing on the deck because the rising heat was cooking us on 
the roof like grilled hotdogs. We fastened clips 6 inches from panel ends and 
also every 12 inches using self-taping stainless steel screws (over-kill but it 
went fast). The slowest work was lapping the 12-feet panels over the 18-feet 
panels because each panel's standing seam had to be notched with a sidecutter 
and fit into place. The electrical work was conventional. The homerun in 
conduit went into the building to a Trace SWODE SW5548 that back-feeds to a 120 
VAC breaker in a subpanel.

A few years ago, I was on campus so I dropped by to inspect the system. The 
deck was enclosed and the space turned into offices and the Trace inverter was 
still working like new.

Joel Davidson


----- Original Message ----- 
  From: North Texas Renewable Energy Inc 
  To: RE-wrenches 
  Sent: Friday, October 22, 2010 7:47 AM
  Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] The perfect solar ready roof


  Phil hits the nail on the head, it sounds like we've both been down this 
road. Problem is it's not always as simple as asking the roofers to do their 
job your way when you are not signing their paycheck.
  I contracted a metal roof PV installation a few years back but only got the 
job on the condition, by the very fastidious homeowner, that I could verify 
that the installation won't cause leaks or void the warranty on the <2 year old 
roof. He gave me the roofers name and the roofing product and mfgr. I 
researched the manufacturers installation requirements for our inland climate. 
Then I called the roofer and asked if the 16" wide panels were installed per 
the mfgrs specs. 
  He proceeded to go ballistic, telling me that if I put one module on 'his' 
roof he would void the warranty. Even after sending him links to the S5 
engineering test results he refused to even talk to me. Finally the customer 
had to have a long talk with the guy before he was convinced his roof had been 
installed correctly. 
  Bottom line you cannot ever be certain about the quality of the installation 
by someone else.  Besides, the homeowners insurance company will have the last 
word on whether a PV mounted roof, found across the street after a windstorm, 
was installed right or not. 
  CYA
  Jim Duncan
    -----Original Message-----
    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]]on Behalf Of Phil Undercuffler
    Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2010 10:29 PM
    To: RE-wrenches
    Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] The perfect solar ready roof


    There is a big difference between standing seam metal roofs and surface 
screwed metal roofs.  With surface screwed (aka ProPanel or Ag Panel), screws 
penetrate through the roof skin and rely upon a neoprene gasket under a cupped 
washer to provide the weather-tight seal.  It makes a pretty good seal and I've 
used it on my own home, but I don't think I'd use it in Montana and I sure 
wouldn't try to attach PV over it.  The days of lagging L feet through the roof 
deck are thankfully waning, and there is almost no practical way to use a 
flashed method of mounting with surface screwed metal. 


    With standing seam roofs, the metal is formed into long U shaped pans. As 
each pan is installed, the roofer nails L shaped "clips" to the deck with one 
side of the clip butted up against the latest pan.  The next pan is butted up 
against the first, which captures the clip between the two.  The upward facing 
legs of the U (and clip) are then crimped and folded over, locking them 
together and forming a watertight seal.  I had a standing seam roof on my home 
in Cincinnati -- eighty years old and still going strong.  


    The biggest challenge with attaching PV to standing seam roofs is not how 
well the modules are attached to the skin, but how well the skin is attached to 
the structure.  Read the archives, but in the end this really comes down to how 
close the roofer installed the clips.  This is where the 4" that Andrew 
mentioned comes into play (seems a little excessive to me, but what the heck, 
I'm not a roofing dude and this isn't something you want to do twice). The 
dream scenario part comes in when you realize that YOU get to drive the bus on 
how closely the clips are installed, as opposed to being presented with a roof 
where you have no idea how many clips were used, what the spacing is, or even 
whether nails or screws or bubble gum were used to connect them to the deck.  
The folks that make the S-5 clamp know metal roofs, and they can help you 
determine what spacing works for your application.  Get that into the contract, 
and make sure someone is on site providing oversight when the roof is installed.


    As far as some of the other options which were presented -- yes, lagging 
into engineered I-beams is probably not a good idea without checking with the 
manufacturer, but adding a second layer of ply doesn't suddenly make a 
structural base for lag screws.  Lag screw pull-out resistance is provided by 
inches of thread embedded into solid wood, and shiners (fasteners that poke 
through the deck into the attic space) won't give any real strength. If it's 
really 1/2" ply, adding a layer of 3/4 ply would give you 1-1/4" of "wood" -- 
do the math and see if that's enough for your climate. Adding 2x blocking would 
be an option if you have access to the attic, but you need to make sure the 
loads transfer to the rafters (I-beams), rather than concentrate on the deck.  
Nailing the blocking would be fine -- after all, that's how houses are built.  
Lagging the blocking as suggested by someone earlier, however, will not only be 
insanely difficult but risk splitting the top chord of the beam.  If you split 
that, I would immediately stop what you're doing and consult with the I-beam 
manufacturer.  Big liability moment there.


    But I'd avoid all that lags, nails, plywood and blocking entirely, put on a 
standing seam metal roof with adequate clips and install the PV with S-5 clamps.


    My .02

    Phil Undercuffler 








    On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:52 AM, benn kilburn <[email protected]> wrote:

      andrew, 
      a few comments added to your last email...


      You Wrote.... 

      If you ask me this is a dream scenario.  The scary thing about S-5!s is 
that you rarely know how often the roofing panels are attached to the decking 
and how well the decking is attached to the framing. i'm not overly familiar 
with standing seam metal roofs (and i know they are not all created equal) but 
aren't the screws holding the metal roof panel to the decking visible at the 
bottom, at the top under the vent cap and anywhere along the length of said 
panel?  i agree about the 'unknown' attachments btwn the decking and the 
framing   In this case you can direct the roofer to fasten the roof as often as 
you want.  I had a PE do an analysis for a sure-fire acceptable attachment 
method for a standing seam roof given: 90 mph wind zone, 18" wide standing seam 
roofing panels, flush-mounted PV array (modules to rail to S-5!s, no tilt 
legs), and his result was that if the roofing panels are fastened every 4" 
along each seam you are in the clear.  No doubt, that seems like quite a few 
fasteners.  He did not address the decking-to-framing attachment, So worst case 
scenario, you get a 90+ mph wind that takes the array, the metal roof and the 
decking for a ride to the ground, (HAS ANYONE SEEN OR HAD THIS HAPPEN?) when it 
is determined that the decking wasn't properly attached to the framing, who do 
ya call?  PV installer, PE who stamped it, roofer?  I'm not looking for a place 
to point fingers, I'm just looking for some insight on this so i understand our 
responsibilities a bit better.  I realize that it would be onerous to confirm 
the number and placement of decking to framing attachments)  but while the roof 
is off you could add as many fasteners as you want.  If the structure of the 
roof is in question I would definitely have a PE look at it and stamp the plans 
before proceeding, but once you have everything under the roof robust and 
approved, you are primed and ready for a worry-free, penetration-free 
S-5!-to-standing-seam array install.

      In another email string someone mentioned issues with S-5!s slipping down 
the roof due to snow which is why I recommend attaching at every seam and 
breaking out that torque-wrench when installing.  


      Good luck!

      ...end of your msg


      in response to Kris' suggestion, don't the 2x6's need to be toe-nailed 
into the 'rafters' on either side? or in this case toe-nailed into the beams? 
which probably wouldn't be much different than the 'inadvisable' lag bolting 
into them.


      cheers,
      benn
      DayStar Renewable Energy Inc.  
      [email protected]
      780-906-7807 
      HAVE A SUNNY DAY 







--------------------------------------------------------------------------

      From: [email protected]
      Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:30:40 -0600
      To: [email protected] 

      Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] The perfect solar ready roof


      If you ask me this is a dream scenario.  The scary thing about S-5!s is 
that you rarely know how often the roofing panels are attached to the decking 
and how well the decking is attached to the framing.  In this case you can 
direct the roofer to fasten the roof as often as you want.  I had a PE do an 
analysis for a sure-fire acceptable attachment method for a standing seam roof 
given: 90 mph wind zone, 18" wide standing seam roofing panels, flush-mounted 
PV array (modules to rail to S-5!s, no tilt legs), and his result was that if 
the roofing panels are fastened every 4" along each seam you are in the clear.  
He did not address the decking-to-framing attachment, but while the roof is off 
you could add as many fasteners as you want.  If the structure of the roof is 
in question I would definitely have a PE look at it and stamp the plans before 
proceeding, but once you have everything under the roof robust and approved, 
you are primed and ready for a worry-free, penetration-free 
S-5!-to-standing-seam array install.
      In another email string someone mentioned issues with S-5!s slipping down 
the roof due to snow which is why I recommend attaching at every seam and 
breaking out that torque-wrench when installing.  

      Good luck!

      Andrew Truitt
      NABCEP Certified PV Installerâ„¢ (ID# 032407-66)
      Truitt Renewable Energy Consulting
      (202) 486-7507
      http://www.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-truitt/8/622/713



      "Don't get me wrong: I love nuclear energy! It's just that I prefer 
fusion to fission. And it just so happens that there's an enormous fusion 
reactor safely banked a few million miles from us. It delivers more than we 
could ever use in just about 8 minutes. And it's wireless!"

      ~William McDonough




      On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Kristopher Schmid 
<[email protected]> wrote:

        What about screwing in double 2x6s flush to the roof deck between the 
beams where your feet will attach and lag bolting into that?  Definitely check 
with the beam manufacturer first, though.
         
        Kris
        Legacy Solar
        864 Clam Falls Trail
        Frederic, WI 54837
        715-653-4295
        [email protected]
        www.legacysolar.com 

          -----Original Message-----
          From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Scott McCalmont
          Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 12:00 AM
          To: RE-wrenches
          Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] The perfect solar ready roof
          In general, you shouldn't drill or cut the flanges on engineered wood 
beams. I think that eliminates lag screws into the rafters. They probably 
wouldn't have the same pull-out strength as a lag screw into a conventional 
rafter, either. 

          Scott

          On Oct 19, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Chris Daum wrote:





        Dear Wrenches:
        I have a composite (shingle) roof at hand, and the owner wants to 
upgrade it to a metal roof and install a 5kw+ array on it.   The rafters are 
those (sort of) particle board I-beams covered with 1/2" plywood (and 
shingles).  What's the best metal roofing you could suggest--and would you beef 
up the wood to lag into?
        Thanks for all your input.
        Chris Daum
        Oasis Montana Inc.
        406-777-4309
        406-777-0830 fax
        _______________________________________________
        List sponsored by Home Power magazine

        List Address: [email protected]

        Options & settings:
        http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

        List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

        List rules & etiquette:
        www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

        Check out participant bios:
        www.members.re-wrenches.org




      _______________________________________________
      List sponsored by Home Power magazine

      List Address: [email protected]

      Options & settings:
      http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

      List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

      List rules & etiquette:
      www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

      Check out participant bios:
      www.members.re-wrenches.org





      -- 




      _______________________________________________ List sponsored by Home 
Power magazine List Address: [email protected] Options & 
settings: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org List rules & 
etiquette: www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm Check out participant bios: 
www.members.re-wrenches.org

      _______________________________________________
      List sponsored by Home Power magazine

      List Address: [email protected]

      Options & settings:
      http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

      List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

      List rules & etiquette:
      www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

      Check out participant bios:
      www.members.re-wrenches.org







------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  List sponsored by Home Power magazine

  List Address: [email protected]

  Options & settings:
  http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List-Archive: 
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

  List rules & etiquette:
  www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

  Check out participant bios:
  www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to