All,

Please note that I left Enphase about one year ago, and joined John Berdner at 
SolarEdge.

To answer the question, virtually all inverters will deliver more power than 
their rating.  The Max power test for listing on the CEC list of eligible 
inverters requires a full power run at elevated temperature for 3 hours.  At 
the end of that test, the power rating listed on the CEC site is either the 
manufacturer's rating, or the lowest single value recorded during the test, 
whichever is lower.  For this reason, most manufacturers build in a little 
extra margin to account for internal measurement and control system error.

By the way, the UL1741 standard requires that the inverter operates within 10% 
of its' rating.


See ya!

Marv
Director of Technology and Support, North America
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc.
Tech Support Mobile:  +530.798.6770
Mobile: +530.392.0356


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marco 
Mangelsdorf
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 12:37 PM
To: 'RE-wrenches'
Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Enphase 215

According to my discussions with Enphase on this subject, the M215 can actually 
put out 225 watts continuous.

Marv?  Please confirm.

marco

The inverter should be current-limited on its output. The other Enphases have a 
higher output power than rated (199 @ 190, 219 @ 210, if memory serves from 
earlier list posts), so this may have a similar window.

215Wac max inverter output / 240V = 0.896
0.896 x 17 = 15.23A
15.23A x 1.25 < 20A so it's OK.
As long as the inverter output is actually 225W or less, you can fit 17 on a 
20A circuit.

As before, you'd have the inverter limiting output when the high-power modules 
are actually performing near or above STC. There will certainly be times during 
the year where the inverters are maxed out but those times will be a small 
portion. Enphase had some documentation on their site about this where they 
claimed it wasn't worth worrying about, but it's a site-specific question that 
the installer should answer.

On 2011/8/24 0:20, Keith Cronin wrote:
> Hey gang
>
> With the 215's on the scene and the tech literature on their website,
> they state you can put up to 17 modules on a string.
>
> Locally, I see folks throwing on 17-235 watt modules. Back of the
> napkin- 235 watts/240 volts = .97 amps.
>
> 17 x .97 = 16.49 amps on the 20 amp circuit. Pushing the envelop of
> the circuit, per NEC and in situations of lower voltage, could tip the
> current higher, per module it seems or is the unit current limiting?
>
> Wouldn't it seem plausible to ebb on 16 vs the 17? The 15 amp circuit
> to
> 20 amp circuit also is a change for the industry at large, as well as
> a few other changes.
>
> As Solarworld is rolling out their 250 watt and others in the same
> zone, it seems there should/could be some caveats on the enphase
> literature to reflect this.
> Thoughts, comments?
>
> Keith
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>
> List Address: [email protected]
>
> Options&  settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List rules&  etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org




************************************************************************************
This footnote confirms that this email message has been scanned by PineApp 
Mail-SeCure for the presence of malicious code, vandals & computer viruses.
************************************************************************************




CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail and its attachments are intended only for 
the use of the individual or entity who is the intended recipient and may 
contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure 
or any type of use under applicable law. If the reader of this e-mail is not 
the intended recipient, or the employee, agent, or representative responsible 
for delivering the e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this e-mail is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please reply 
immediately to the sender.
P Please think of the environment before printing this email
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Options & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to