SMA will shut down w/ the removal of the meter. Installing the inverter w/in 
the 10' area will meet this requirement.
On May 21, 2014, at 9:48 PM, Jeffrey Quackenbush wrote:

> I recently took a code update course with the electrical inspector in Andover 
> MA, and he said that he is only allowing micro-inverter systems in his 
> jurisdiction at the moment. 
> 
> SolarEdge and other auxiliary optimizers are not able to certify that they 
> will shut down within 10 seconds. I understand that the manufacturers are 
> working on this, but I'm not sure about their timeframe. Most jurisdictions 
> in MA, I believe, are accepting SolarEdge or Tigo systems, but they don't 
> comply at the moment with the 10 second shut-down provision in 690.12 (2).
> 
> The inspector said that he is interpreting 690.12 (1) to say that the means 
> of performing the shutdown should be within 10'/5' of the array, so that 
> means locating the shutdown means on the roof in most cases. The last time I 
> brought this up on the Wrenches list, it was suggested installers could use 
> some kind of relay setup with an accessible activation switch and a relay 
> disconnect. However, 690.12 (5) says: "Equipment that performs the rapid 
> shutdown shall be listed and identified". 690.12 (5) unfortunately doesn't 
> tell us what the equipment should be listed and identified for. It could be 
> listed and identified for the circuit characteristics and shutdown time, or 
> it could be listed and identified for the requirements of 690.12 as a whole 
> function with its own UL specifications. It's possible to find equipment for 
> the former interpretation, but I'm not aware of anything available for the 
> latter (is anyone writing a UL regime for this?). And I think that the latter 
> interpretation is reasonable, given the ambiguity in the way the text is 
> written, and what is usually meant by "listed and identified" taken together.
> 
> I like micro-inverters for small systems. And I like the SolarEdge model for 
> larger systems with weird layouts, shading issues, or a premium on 
> production. However, central inverters are, depending on the configuration 
> and size of the system, 0.05 $/W to 0.25 $/W less expensive than 
> micro-inverters or DC optimizer systems, and that increase in cost is most 
> likely to come out of the contractor's pocket. I also see this affecting 
> sales for companies producing central inverters as the 2014 code rolls out 
> across the country. If someone has a solution for central inverters under 
> 690.12 when dealing with skeptical AHJs, I'd appreciate hearing more about it.
> 
> Regards,
> Jeffrey Quackenbush
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, May 20, 2014 2:07 PM, Phil Forest <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> 
> All in all, not longer, glad to say. 
> Strings can have more modules, so there's fewer home runs. Optimizer wires 
> are longer than module wires, they even reach when installing modules in 
> landscape, so fewer jumpers. Be thoughtful when mounting optimizers to rails 
> so it's easy to connect after module is clamped down. Bolts that attach 
> optimizers slide into rails from the end (UniRac SM type rails). You supply 
> your own nuts and bolts. They supply a star washer for bonding optimizer to 
> rail for EG. 
> We mounted optimizers to modules on one job when using UniRac Sunframe. 
> SunFrame is a pain in my neck, optimizers or not. 
> Phil Forest
> South Mountain Company
> 
> On May 20, 2014, at 1:33 PM, Will White <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> 
> 
> Phil,
>  
> Do you find that the DC optimizer adds to the amount of time on an install?
>  
> Thanks,
> Will
>  
> From: RE-wrenches [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Phil Forest
> Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 1:26 PM
> To: RE-wrenches
> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] 2014 NEC
>  
> Will,
> No problems with inspectors for us in MA, regarding rapid shutdown, since we 
> recently switched to using SolarEdge central inverters with optimizer under 
> each module, for roof mounted installs. 
> So far so good. They seem well made and engineered. Tip: you have to enable 
> the arc fault protection when commissioning, ships disabled. 
> Phil Forest
> South Mountain Company
> 
> On May 20, 2014, at 10:59 AM, Will White <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wrenches,
>  
> Is anyone else having problems with inspectors and the 2014 NEC?  In Mass 
> we’re having all kinds of issues with inspectors requiring/allowing an array 
> of different things for 690.12 rapid shut down ranging from roof top 
> disconnects, disconnects on the side of a house 20’ up, disconnects in 
> attics, or only disconnects that can be activated on the ground.  It varies 
> between inspectors.
>  
> We’re also having problems with one inspector requiring arc fault breakers on 
> Enphase even though there are no UL listed arc fault breakers that can be 
> back fed or he wants us to run the trunk cable in a raceway. 
>  
> It’s getting very difficult to install in Mass.
>  
> Thanks,
> Will
>  
> Will White
> Operations Manager - New England
> RGS Energy
> 64 Main St. |Montpelier, VT 05602
> tel 802.223.7804 | mobile 802.234.3167 | fax 802.223.8980
> RGSEnergy.com | [email protected]
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> _______________________________________________
>> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
>> 
>> List Address: [email protected]
>> 
>> Change email address & settings:
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List-Archive: 
>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>> 
>> List rules & etiquette:
>> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>> 
>> Check out participant bios:
>> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Home Power magazine
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Change email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

> [email protected]               www.SWNL.net
>                 Solarwinds Northernlights       
>        Serving Mid Coast Maine & Northern California
>                          207-832-7574   Cl. 610-517-8401                      
>         
>                               Blair "TUMP" May
>                ********  MAINE'S CHARTER ********
>                       NABCEP    "Certified PV Installer" 
>    
>               ********  MAINE'S CHARTER ********
>                   Trace Xantrex "Certified" Dealer / Installer"
> 


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Home Power magazine

List Address: [email protected]

Change email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to