I emailed Brad Heavner, the policy director at CALSEIA, today and got this 
response in part (I omitted his expression of exasperation):

" . . . PG&E’s storage interconnection manager, Bennett Chabot, was on a panel 
with me two weeks ago and he assured people that PG&E staff should be up to 
speed by now. He pointed people to the EGI webpage at 
http://www.pge.com/en/b2b/energytransmissionstorage/egi/grid/index.page. He 
also encouraged people to email [email protected] if they have problems. They 
are required to respond to inquiries within a week. "

I followed the link and spent a fruitless half hour on PG&E's website, 
including using the search bar and every search term I could think of. I found 
nothing about NEM with storage. Maybe someone else has better search skills 
than me.

So I emailed the rule21 folks. Possibly someone who knows something will 
contact me within a week.


Bruce Erickson
Mendocino Solar Service
PO Box 1252
Mendocino, CA 95460
707-937-1701
707-937-1741 fax
[email protected]

Celebrating 20 Years in Solar! 1994-2014





On Jul 2, 2014, at 5:46 PM, Christopher Warfel wrote:

> I think so. Bruce's post indicated that 10kW seemed incorrect. So assuming a 
> 10 kW inverter exporting for the onpeak period over an unknown assumed number 
> of days assuming no recharge from the utility?  I know this has a lot of 
> different ways of being looked at, which is why the atakeholders need to look 
> at this.  At this point, it seems like the optimal solution is complicated 
> from a metering and accounting perspective. They don't want off peak 
> consumption being used to sell on peak. Starting from there, how do they 
> acheive this from an implementable policy perspective?  
> 
> 
> ------- Original Message ------- On 7/3/2014 12:28 AM wrote:
> " In any case, a 10 kW battery system, will probably exceed most grid 
> connected battery systems, and the whole issue is moot. "
> 
> shouldnt battery capacity be in kWh?
> 
>  
> todd
> 
>  
>  < /p>
> 
>  
>  
> On Wednesday, July 2, 2014 5:00pm, "Christopher Warfel" said:
> 
> I am not familiar with PGE's time of use rates for residential. I have to 
> assume that they do have TOU built into their metering. Buying at any time is 
> predicated by the load of the facility, including battery load, so this is 
> probably their concern. Given the costs of batteries it seems uneconomical to 
> buy batteries just to store energy to sell on peak, but I don't have your 
> peak vs off peak tariff.  We have been putting in two meters on our systems, 
> but to make it work properly for determining actual PV generation we had to 
> put a detent in the meter on the back up panel circuit. Now the only way I 
> think that this can be done by utility type meters is to buy a programmable 
> meter and have it record input and output similar to how the utility meter 
> operates. 
> 
> If they will accept a DAS system (and some are now compliant with uti lity 
> accuracy requirements, place a product such as EGauge on the battery back up 
> circuit. If you are exporting at a time with n o or little solar input, then 
> they know you are using your batteries to generate revenues. This could 
> required a insolation meter, and all of this will get expensive and 
> complicated quickly. It seems that PV can be used for grid support by 
> exporting and PGE or whomever should encourage on peak selling back to them. 
> They could set a price for exported power below tariff, but still acceptable 
> to the owner, and they would find that the solar exported power on peak is 
> below their marginal cost for electricity.  
> 
> I know I have complicated this, but this is really what an industry group, 
> the commission and the utility should work out.  In any case, a 10 kW battery 
> system, will probably exceed most grid connected battery systems, and the 
> whole issue is moot. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from Finest Planet WebMail.
> 
> Christopher Warfel, ENTECH Engineering, Inc. PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 
> 02807, 401-466-8978 (v)(f) _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to