Someone previously at AEE tried to get NEMA involved in setting a standard,
but it turned out that they were not getting cooperation from the mfg, so
could not proceed.

Brad

On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:28 PM Bryan Norkunas <br...@pv-cables.com> wrote:

> Yes, I have seen and have copies of many of these 3rd party
> “compatibility” tests.
>
>
>
> *From:* Brian Mehalic [mailto:br...@solarenergy.org]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2019 1:16 PM
> *To:* Bryan Norkunas
> *Cc:* RE-wrenches
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] connector mismatch
>
>
>
> You say you've seen many of these tests in the past; do you specifically
> mean the intermatability test?
>
>
>
> Thanks for the info! (And you also really helped me out identifying some
> connectors on a problem-job a couple months back...thanks again!).
>
>
>
> Brian Mehalic
> NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installation Professional™ R031508-59
>
> National Electrical Code® CMP-4 Member
>
> (520) 204-6639
>
>
>
> Solar Energy International
> http://www.solarenergy.org
>
>
>
> SEI Professional Services
>
> http://www.seisolarpros.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 1:07 PM Bryan Norkunas <br...@pv-cables.com>
> wrote:
>
> Also note the Intertek testing, I have seen many of these in the past –
>
> but never one of them tested with 12AWG or 10AWG connectors, it has always
> been 14AWG for some reason.
>
>
>
> And as a company that specializes in this niche, I can say in the last 10
> years we have never had the request to manufacture anything smaller than
> 12AWG when it came to PV Connectors.
>
>
>
> *Bryan Norkunas*
>
> br...@pv-cables.com
>
>
>
> [image: Description: Description: PV-Cables_Logo_Transparent_Bkgnd_140x140]
>
> *PV-Cables Inc.*
>
> 1155 Redway Drive
>
> PO Box 2562
>
> Redway, CA 95560
>
> (707) 923-3000 office
>
> www.pv-cables.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Bryan Norkunas
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2019 12:57 PM
> *To:* 'RE-wrenches'
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] connector m[image: Description: Description:
> cid:image002.jpg@01CD22E8.974B6470]ismatch
>
>
>
> Ray,
>
>
>
> Solarworld went from using MC4 connectors, then to Kostal KSK4 connectors,
> then Amphenol H4, and finally Amphenol UTX connectors.
>
>
>
> The cross mating with the KSK4 connectors had the most issues and we
> assembled a lot of adapters for end users and installers.
>
>
>
> Back in 2016, we were talking with Solarworld about the Amphenol UTX/H4 to
> MC4 connections failing.  (I attached the Compatibility letter that
> Solarworld was providing their customers, as well as the Amphenol
> Compatibility documents )
>
>
>
> Back then, I was mating connectors and grinding away the plastic housings
> to determine the terminal overlap of cross mated connectors.
>
> Here are my notes from back then:
>
> The overlap on an MC4 to MC4 connection = 0.305”
>
> The overlap on an MC4 to UTX connection = 0.265”
>
> A lot of the older H4 to MC4 issues were end users not fully seating MC4
> female to the H4 male.  It takes some force to get them to fit completely
> and a nightmare to disconnect if needed.
>
> These tended to fail in higher heat or higher humidity environments.  The
> picture below is one that wasn’t fully seated.
>
> [image: cid:image003.jpg@01D18A5E.48835320]
>
>
>
>
>
> Hanwa Q Cell have used many different connectors on their modules over the
> years.
>
>
>
> Jinko modules usually have Jinko connectors in my small amount of
> experience with them.  Jinko still does not offer a crimping tool for their
> connectors, that I know of and still only UL for 20A.  We do little work
> with these connectors, so my input here might be outdated.
>
>
>
> Lastly, I have seen a few larger distributing customers of ours doing good
> work on obtaining the connector/module info from module manufactures, prior
> to placing their blanket orders.  In turn, the module mfg.’s are typically
> supplying them (or sometimes us) connectors for homerun cables, adapters,
> etc.    And finally the end customer is knowing what connectors on the
> modules they are purchasing, with the availability of getting the correct
> connectors/homerun cables needed to complete the install.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Bryan Norkunas*
>
> br...@pv-cables.com
>
>
>
> [image: Description: Description: PV-Cables_Logo_Transparent_Bkgnd_140x140]
>
> *PV-Cables Inc.*
>
> 1155 Redway Drive
>
> PO Box 2562
>
> Redway, CA 95560
>
> (707) 923-3000 office
>
> www.pv-cables.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* RE-wrenches [mailto:re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org
> <re-wrenches-boun...@lists.re-wrenches.org>] *On Behalf Of *Ray
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 19, 2019 12:08 PM
> *To:* re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
> *Subject:* Re: [RE-wrenches] connector mismatch
>
>
>
> I did some research on the modules we've used over the past 15+ years to
> see if we had potential mismatched connector issues. We've used Amphenol H4
> connects since the advent of locking solar connectors.  We had assumed they
> were compatible back then.
>
> Solarworld switched from MC4 to H4 somewhere back 2013 to 2015. I didn't
> even notice. SW 280s through SW 300 looks like H4, while SW 270s and back
> to the long, skinny SW 165s are MC 4, but its not that clear, as I found a
> spec sheet for an SW 260 with an H4.
>
> *Conclusion: Basically we can't be sure.*
>
> Hanwa Q cell, looks like their 60 cell mods run the MC 4 or MC 4
> compatible (whatever that means) while their 72 cell mods apparently use
> the H4/ UTX
>
> *Conclusion: Total confusion in the field.*
>
> Jinko?  They don't even list the connector type on any of the spec sheets
> I have for the past few years.
>
> *Conclusion: No way for a designer/ installer to know beforehand what
> connector to use in the field.*
>
> Basically this is a total break down of responsibility for the solar
> industry; a complete lack of standards. Why hasn't an organization like
> NEMA stepped in to standardize the connectors like all AC connectors have
> been, going back for over a century?
>
> I made a very wrong assumption that when our industry adopted the MC 4/ H4
> locking type connectors that they were standardized and compatible.   I can
> only hope that my systems running at relatively low voltage (<150 vdc) will
> not have issues.
>
>
>
> Ray Walters
>
> Remote Solar
>
> 303 505-8760
>
> On 9/4/19 4:26 PM, Jerry Shafer wrote:
>
> Just to add, l had a lab and l did testing on connectors, we found that
> most of the aec issues were under low light. This appeared to be when
> iradiance was low and once the irads went up the issue was less likely,
> this was because the Male-female contact was not tight enough and under
> lower power it would arc instead of heating up and expanding. I used a IR
> Camera but could see little change due to the plastic.
>
> Then l used an IV curve tester and shaded partially shaded the module
> after several repeat testing the connectors got warm. I would suggest
> making your own connector pull out tool to check the contact pressures.
> This is where you may find your problem components. It appears that early
> am testing had lower volts and the inverter pushed the current up and
> causes the loose connector to fail due to the lower volts.
>
> This testing was done both in the field 1/2 meg and lab testing results
> were very close.
>
> The modules used for testing were Trina and the field inverters were ABB
> and Fronius
>
> Sorry for the long note
>
> Jerry
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019, 2:52 PM Steven Lawrence <lawrenceste...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Everyone,
>
>
>
> Just to add to this, I've seen multiple melted connectors that couldn't be
> traced to anything other than mixing manufacturers.  I've seen some
> connectors where you can clearly seeing arcing on the pin itself and
> nowhere else.  The crimps and the housing were fine.  I've postulated it
> had to do with slightly different metals expanding/contracting at different
> rates.  I've made it a very hard rule at my company to never mix
> manufacturers of connectors.  When we order modules, we specifically have
> the PO call out the manufacturer of the connector (can't just be "MC4
> compatible").  Typically we order that same brand of connectors, but
> sometimes we end up getting 6" jumpers made by a harness company (there are
> some connectors out there that can only work with #12 wire.  Can't use them
> on #10 homeruns).  It's drastically cut down on the number of melted
> connectors.  We've averaged maybe 1 or 2 on 6MW projects over a year with
> this hard requirement versus 100+ we had on a 1MW rooftop project that
> mixed multiple manufacturers.
>
>
>
> Steven Lawrence
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
>
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
>
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
> List-Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
>
>
> List rules & etiquette:
>
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
>
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
>
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
>
> List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org
>
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
>
> List-Archive:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html
>
> List rules & etiquette:
> www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
>
> Check out or update participant bios:
> www.members.re-wrenches.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List-Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/maillist.html

List rules & etiquette:
www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to