Hey Brian,

Following up on both sets of questions:

Can you attach the spec sheet? Does it show curves at different irradiances? — 
ATTACHED

What was the time of day (or was it just cloudy?). — ~11:00am

How are you measuring the cell temp? — Fluke Temp gun (new battery)

The string voltages were +/- 1.5% of adjacent

Meter — Hioki CM4374 (calibrated recently)

Testing a single module, while ideal, is not practical unless we run into 
issues. I should have the ~480 strings worth of measured data back later today.


> On Nov 3, 2020, at 2:52 PM, Brian Mehalic <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hey Jason, IEC 62446-1 allows for:
> 
> Testing Voc of a single module and using that to calc the target string 
> voltage
> and
> "For systems with multiple identical strings and where there is stable 
> irradiance conditions, voltages between strings can be compared"
> 
> Regardless, it would be interesting to have a test on a single mod (well some 
> number of single mods).
> 
> What meter are you using, and has it been calibrated recently?
> 
> 
> Brian Mehalic 
> NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installation Professional™ R031508-59
> National Electrical Code® CMP-4 Member
> (520) 204-6639
> 
> Solar Energy International
> http://www.solarenergy.org <http://www.solarenergy.org/>
> 
> SEI Professional Services
> http://www.seisolarpros.com <http://www.seisolarpros.com/>
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:32 AM Brian Mehalic <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> A few more questions:
> 
> Can you attach the spec sheet? Does it show curves at different irradiances?
> 
> What was the time of day (or was it just cloudy?). 
> 
> How are you measuring the cell temp?
> 
> Brian
> 
> > On Nov 3, 2020, at 8:50 AM, Jason Kechijian <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > Hey Jay and Brian,
> > 
> > System: 2p SAT
> > Mods/String: 27
> > 
> > Measurements taken on average of CB
> > Ambient: ~23ºC
> > Module: 21.4ºC
> > Wind: moderate
> > Irradiance: 500W/m2
> > 
> > Expected Voc: 1,320.37
> > 
> > Testing based on IEC 62446
> > Measured Voc on a range of 9 string combiner: 1251 - 1271. 1251 being the 
> > only string in the CB at less than 5% of expected, which I am sure the wind 
> > had some effects. All voltages in the CB were +/- 1.5% of the adjacent.
> > 
> > I’ll share more results as the come in from the field. 
> > 
> > The questions:
> > Which of the two Vocs should we use? The average of the two?
> > Since we are not taking the BOM temp measurements from a back sheet, but 
> > rather a cell. What does the thermal effect of glass play on the 
> > temperature reading vs. the back sheet. (May be wording this wrong, but I 
> > think y’all get the point)
> > 
> > I have searched the inter webs and not found much guidance/support in 
> > particular to this query.
> > 
> > 
> > Jason Kechijian
> > 
> > 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hey wrenches,
> >> 
> >> Does anyone have any guidance to which values to use when testing open 
> >> circuit voltage on bi-facial modules, considering you take the temperature 
> >> reading from the cell vs. the back sheet? Also, what would be the correct 
> >> module Voc to use since there are values for both the front and back?
> >> 
> >> 405W Module: Front/Back
> >> Pmpp: 405 / 285
> >> Vmpp: 40.89 / 41.10
> >> Impp: 9.91 / 6.94
> >> Voc: 48.42 / 46.99
> >> Isc: 10.38 / 7.28
> >> Module efficiency: 19.7% / 13.9% 
> >> Temp coefficient Pmpp: -0.3528%/?C
> >> Temp coefficient Isc: +0.0400%/?C
> >> Temp coefficient Voc: -0.2769%/?C
> >> Nominal: 44+/-2?C
> >> 
> >> I was using the front Voc and Voc temp coefficient, but I am getting some 
> >> results which are not in line with the 5% of expected.
> >> 
> >> Jason D. Kechijian, LEED AP
> >> NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> Message: 2
> >> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 08:25:20 -0700
> >> From: Jay <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> To: RE-wrenches <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Bi-facial Open Circuit voltage testing
> >> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> >> 
> >> Hi Jason,
> >> 
> >> What are you seeing in terms of measurements?
> >> 
> >> Temp air/module 
> >> Voc
> >> Irradiance
> >> Etc
> >> 
> >> Jay
> >> Peltz power
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Message: 3
> >> Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 08:41:21 -0800
> >> From: Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> To: "RE-wrenches" <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Bi-facial Open Circuit voltage testing
> >> Message-ID: <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> >> 
> >> I am curious why you care?  Is it close to maxing out cold weather Voc for
> >> one more panel in the string? If so I would be conservative and use one
> >> less panel.
> >> 
> >> I have an old Sanyo Bi Array and it pretty much has never gone outside the
> >> cold weather Voc that is logged by the controller. The 600v mppt just
> >> cranks out the power when the snow is off the array. It does pretty well
> >> also when the snow is on it. 
> >> 
> >> Just curious what you are doing? Testing used panels to make sure they are
> >> good? If so I would line them all up exactly the same and have a second set
> >> of eyes to record it all.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Dave Angelini Offgrid Solar
> >> "we go where powerlines don't"
> >> http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/ <http://members.sti.net/offgridsolar/>
> >> e-mail [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> text 209 813 0060
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> Message: 4
> >> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 09:53:43 -0700
> >> From: Brian Mehalic <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> To: RE-wrenches <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >> Subject: Re: [RE-wrenches] Bi-facial Open Circuit voltage testing
> >> Message-ID:
> >>    <capkgs9tz6yehzweoardp0mvamhuxmfhcluoprowetxynew0...@mail.gmail.com 
> >> <mailto:capkgs9tz6yehzweoardp0mvamhuxmfhcluoprowetxynew0...@mail.gmail.com>>
> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >> 
> >> I second Jay's request for some numbers, I'm curious about this not having
> >> participated directly in any bifacial projects yet.  The difference in Voc
> >> and Vmp ratios is interesting.
> >> 
> >> Brian Mehalic
> >> NABCEP Certified Solar PV Installation Professional? R031508-59
> >> National Electrical Code? CMP-4 Member
> >> (520) 204-6639
> >> 
> >> Solar Energy International
> >> http://www.solarenergy.org <http://www.solarenergy.org/>
> >> 
> >> SEI Professional Services
> >> http://www.seisolarpros.com <http://www.seisolarpros.com/>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 8:55 AM Jay <[email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>> Hi Jason,
> >>> What are you seeing in terms of measurements?
> >>> Temp air/module
> >>> Voc
> >>> Irradiance
> >>> Etc
> >>> Jay
> >>> Peltz power
> >>>> On Nov 2, 2020, at 8:18 AM, Jason Kechijian <[email protected] 
> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>> ?Hey wrenches,
> >>>> Does anyone have any guidance to which values to use when testing open
> >>> circuit voltage on bi-facial modules, considering you take the temperature
> >>> reading from the cell vs. the back sheet? Also, what would be the correct
> >>> module Voc to use since there are values for both the front and back?
> >>>> 405W Module: Front/Back
> >>>> Pmpp: 405 / 285
> >>>> Vmpp: 40.89 / 41.10
> >>>> Impp: 9.91 / 6.94
> >>>> Voc: 48.42 / 46.99
> >>>> Isc: 10.38 / 7.28
> >>>> Module efficiency: 19.7% / 13.9%
> >>>> Temp coefficient Pmpp: -0.3528%/?C
> >>>> Temp coefficient Isc: +0.0400%/?C
> >>>> Temp coefficient Voc: -0.2769%/?C
> >>>> Nominal: 44+/-2?C
> >>>> I was using the front Voc and Voc temp coefficient, but I am getting
> >>> some results which are not in line with the 5% of expected.
> >>>> Jason D. Kechijian, LEED AP
> >>>> NABCEP Certified PV Installation Professional?
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> >>>> List Address: [email protected] 
> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>> Change listserver email address & settings:
> >>>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> >>>> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> >>>> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try
> >>> the other:
> >>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
> >>>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
> >>>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> >>>> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> >>>> List rules & etiquette:
> >>>> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm 
> >>>> <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
> >>>> Check out or update participant bios:
> >>>> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> >>> List Address: [email protected] 
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>> Change listserver email address & settings:
> >>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> >>> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> >>> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the
> >>> other:
> >>> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
> >>> <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
> >>> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> >>> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> >>> List rules & etiquette:
> >>> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm 
> >>> <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
> >>> Check out or update participant bios:
> >>> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/>
> >> -------------- next part --------------
> >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> >> URL: 
> >> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20201102/013a4e3f/attachment-0001.html
> >>  
> >> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org/attachments/20201102/013a4e3f/attachment-0001.html>>
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> Subject: Digest Footer
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> >> 
> >> List Address: [email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >> 
> >> Change listserver email address & settings:
> >> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> >> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> >> 
> >> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the 
> >> other:
> >> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
> >> <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
> >> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> >> <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> >> 
> >> List rules & etiquette:
> >> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm 
> >> <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
> >> 
> >> Check out or update participant bios:
> >> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/>
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> ------------------------------
> >> 
> >> End of RE-wrenches Digest, Vol 13, Issue 367
> >> ********************************************
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> > 
> > List Address: [email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > 
> > Change listserver email address & settings:
> > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> > <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> > 
> > There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the 
> > other:
> > https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ 
> > <https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/>
> > http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org 
> > <http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org>
> > 
> > List rules & etiquette:
> > http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm 
> > <http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm>
> > 
> > Check out or update participant bios:
> > http://www.members.re-wrenches.org <http://www.members.re-wrenches.org/>
> _______________________________________________
> List sponsored by Redwood Alliance
> 
> List Address: [email protected]
> 
> Change listserver email address & settings:
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the 
> other:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org
> 
> List rules & etiquette:
> http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm
> 
> Check out or update participant bios:
> http://www.members.re-wrenches.org
> 

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to