On 2/1/2023 2:58 PM, Starlight via RE-wrenches wrote:
Have you (or any) installed surge suppression on the PV input side to clamp the open circuit voltage surge?

That's not where the issue is and isn't really a solution. As I explained in my previous e-mail, the issue is the open circuit on the output leaves no where for the energy in the MPPT controllers inductor to go and the only option is for the voltage to rise until it finds somewhere to go.

Surge suppressors, such as sold by Midnite Solar, are nothing more than Metal Oxide Varistors. Or in the case of Delta, they are pieces of wire in sand. They require large rise in voltage before they conduct.

MOVs are sometimes found on the battery side of inverters and charge controllers, but their clamp time and voltage before clamping requires additional circuitry that works faster to protect fragile semiconductors.


If you are proposing using a surge supressor to regulate the voltage of an island between a charge controller and an inverter when the battery is disconnected, that's also a no go. Once the MOV clamps, it stays clamped until voltage goes essentially to zero or until it blows up. It's not a regulator.

-

To further stir the pot, it is definitely possible to design electronics that can deal with load dumps and survive most anything. Aerospace electronics come pretty close. But all that costs money and takes space to do. Are we comfortable with requiring $16,000 charge controllers so they can handle load dumps reliably from a poorly thought out NEC requirement? I think the fossil fuel industry would be very happy with the cost of renewable energy electronics being an order of magnitude more expensive.





Larry Crutcher
Starlight Solar Power Systems



On Feb 1, 2023, at 1:23 PM, William Bryce via RE-wrenches <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

I can also backup what Jim has said, and have seen the same gear destroyed by removing the battery abruptly when the controller is under heavy load. They can die, and sometimes die spectacularly.

Have seen SolArk inverters integrated MPPT controllers blow up when lithium battery BMS disconnects. Not a field fixable issue.

Just flip off the breaker when the solar is working hard and and the SolArk will give up the smoke.

Like I originally said, it’s the non talked about issue that is a big issue depending on what gear your using.

On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:49 PM James Jefferson Jarvis via RE-wrenches <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:



    On 2/1/2023 12:25 PM, Alex MeVay via RE-wrenches wrote:
     > Although our controllers are probably smaller than what you would be
     > considering in this discussion, surviving a load dump (suddenly
     > disconnected battery) is an engineering requirement for us, and
    likely
     > would be for other responsible MFG's on this list (boB?).  The charge
     > controller can either handle full input voltage on the output, or
     > there is a comparator that will shut the controller down instantly
     > when the output voltage gets too high.

    So that's part of the picture.

    The other part of the picture is the rest of the system. The discussion
    and what NEC is mandating is that the battery be disconnected. As
    far as
    I can tell, there isn't an explicit requirement in all cases that
    all of
    the power inputs into the system are all going to go away at exactly
    the
    same time .... or ever. This leaves things like charge controllers
    getting input power potentially from PV or wind or grid or generator or
    something else. And nothing in the NEC, as far as I can tell, is
    mandating that all of the DC loads be disconnected. So the loads are
    online. Now the regulation circuit (switching power supply in the case
    of a MPPT controller) is regulating variable loads and nothing is
    providing substantial resistance to change. Normally the battery is
    acting like a very very very big capacitor. But without the battery,
    there isn't enough damping in the control loops and voltage stability
    will suffer. This is where you get 250 volts on your normally 48 volt
    battery bus. Or 3 volts. Or -80 volts. Or all of those in a fraction of
    second. This sort of thing is hard on electronics and will cause
    failures.


    Alex's comment about Genasun's controllers handling full input voltage
    on the output is probably unique to their niche product. Looking at
    their biggest controller, it appears to support VOC of 34 volts. At 34
    volts, he can use 50V or 100V rated components on his output. For a
    150V
    input controller, you probably can. But you wouldn't because it
    would be
    too expensive. But on a 600V or 1000V controller, there's just no way
    that you do that because 1000V rated components are big and expensive
    and their spacing requirements are huge compared 100V level sort of
    stuff. So the way bigger MPPT controllers deal with load dump is with
    transient voltage supression or other diodes to handle the voltage
    spike
    caused by the inductor when the load goes away. When operated in
    parameters, these parts don't wear out. But it can be interesting to
    size them adequately to account for inductance elsewhere in the system
    adding to voltage and energy that has to be absorbed.


    There is a very simple experiment that anybody can perform to see how
    equipment handles a load dump: Simply wait for a sunny day and turn off
    the battery breaker. If no magic smoke was released, turn back on
    battery breaker. If still no magic smoke was released, then great, your
    system survived a load dump.

    If you are at all uncomfortable doing this and/or your system gets
    destroyed in the process, think back to my earlier security comments
    about having a self destruct switch on the outside of your building
    allowing anyone walking by to do this experiment for you.

    I have personally destroyed Outback, Midnite, and Morningstar
    controllers inadvertently or intentionally doing load dumps by shutting
    off their output breaker. Typically the TVS diodes short out and
    secondary over current protection (circuit breaker) trips before things
    catch on fire. Usuaully the UL94V0 rating on the circuit board and the
    box the circuit board is in prevents fire from spreading when things do
    get wild.

    But I've also seen all of those brands survive a load dump.

    I have multiple customer who have fielded lithium battery systems to
    cold locations and have had battery BMS disconnect the battery from the
    rest of the system. Ten's of thousands of dollars of equipment has been
    destroyed in these islanding events.


    Some thoughts, for what they are worth.

    -James Jarvis
    APRS World, LLC


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: [email protected]

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to