Hi Jason, I spoke with Solark re Homegrid and EG4. Did not mention you name but your experience.  You have been really helpful.  I am centering on open loop w EG4. My longest work commute is 15 minutes on this island, so it's just having the time to trouble shoot. Plus, one mess up, and everyone knows about it. Chris

On 9/3/2025 1:18 PM, Jason Szumlanski via RE-wrenches wrote:
Nothing like a coincidence...

A client on an island with three stacks of 8 HomeGrid batteries has just called me to report that the entire system is down. All of the battery BMS module displays are dark. I have mySolArk data from three inverters there that show the batteries were topped off and just idling along with solar covering the load at 5:00 pm last night when the power suddenly went out, killing the Starlink connection. I'm going for a boat ride tomorrow to check it out. Ugh.

I will report my findings. Not sure if it's a battery or inverter issue, but the customer's handyman reported nothing on the battery screens, which seems strange to me. Even an error should not turn the display off, as far as I recall.

P.S. No power loss notifications from Sol-Ark is a frustrating loss of functionality. I heard a rumor on Facebook that they are fixing this in mySolArk this month, but I'm not holding my breath.


Jason Szumlanski
Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956
Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208


On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 4:31 PM Jason Szumlanski <ja...@floridasolardesigngroup.com> wrote:

    We have some stacks of HomeGrid out there in various capacities,
    from the smallest with five in a stack, up to four fully populated
    stacks of eight. In total, I oversee around 150 Stack'd batteries,
    including many that I installed and some that were installed by
    others. I will say that they are easy to install, have a nice bold
    visual interface, look good, and perform up to expectations. They
    communicate flawlessly with Sol-Ark 15k. However...

    I believe there is a fundamental design flaw in this stackable
    battery architecture. Here is why I am no longer offering HomeGrid
    in a nutshell:

      * When one battery in a stack has a fault, the entire stack
        faults out, which renders the stack non-functional until you
        either:
         1. Remove the battery from the stack or turn the circuit
            breaker off, and:
         2. Reconfigure all of the dip switches to remove the
            battery from the communication loop, then:
         3. Reprogram the master BMS to recognize the new stack
            members and their positions.
      * If you have multiple stacks, you have to do all of the above,
        and in addition:
         1. Remove a battery from each additional stack to balance
            them, then perform all of the above steps on each stack.
         2. But before you reprogram each master BMS you have to take
            the stacks out of parallel communication, then reprogram
            the parallel stacks before operation again.
         3. Making each stack equal is per HomeGrid support, but in
            practice, I don't know if it is necessary, especially if
            you are losing one of eight (12.5%). If you have smaller
            stacks, this might be a bigger issue.
      * To diagnose a battery issue with a laptop and cable and get
        warranty support, you can only do that with the master BMS
        because each battery does not have a comm port. That means you
        have to have the entire stack non-functional while you perform
        diagnostics, which is not ideal for off-grid settings,
        especially if there is only one stack.
      * If a battery fails to balance and becomes depleted, causing a
        fault, there are no simple terminal bolts to connect an
        external charger. I'm not sure how you would even accomplish a
        manual charge without opening up the case.

    The EG4 server rack batteries work in a fundamentally different
    way. Each battery has an independent BMS. When there is an alarm
    in a stack or stacks of batteries, the entire battery bank does
    not fault out. You can physically take a battery out of the stack
    without changing any dip switches on the other batteries. You can
    shut one down or experience a fault on one battery without any
    others shutting down. I have tried this with the LifePower4
    batteries, even when there are multiple communication strings of
    16 batteries connected to a communication hub. The rest of the
    batteries just keep on working, which is the way it should be! The
    communication hub will just show zero values for the battery that
    is missing from the stack. I cannot confirm if this is the case
    with the LL batteries, but I suspect it would be. In a way, this
    is like having the batteries in an open loop in terms of
    resilience, with all of the benefits that closed-loop battery
    communications offers. I have had a small variety of battery
    issues with EG4, and not once has the whole bank of batteries been
    affected by one battery's issue.

    Side note about another server rack option: I can confirm that
    Pytes Ebox V1 batteries in a communication stack will shut down
    all batteries if one has a fault, at least confirmed by one
    situation I had. This is despite each battery having it's own BMS
    and console port to communicate with the batteries. The situation
    in my case was a battery that had no "Barcode" programmed into it,
    which was causing a parallel communication fault and shutting down
    the whole stack. In this case, physically bypassing the battery
    with the issue with a Cat5 coupling worked fine. There are no dip
    switches to set, and the master battery reconfigures the
    communication stack automatically. With Pytes' support, I was able
    to manually code in the Barcode to the BMS with a console cable,
    and the problem went away. I am not sure if all varieties of
    faults would have the same effect with Pytes EBoxes, but this
    communication issue definitely caused the whole stack to fault out.


    The phenomenon of the new breed of LFP batteries lacking
    reliability/redundancy inspired a blog post that I did just a
    couple of weeks ago:
    
https://floridasolardesigngroup.com/homegrid-stackd-batteries-the-redundancy-fallacy


    A couple of other notes on HomeGrid:

      * They do not have any way to connect conduit to the BMS. You
        wouldn't want to anyway, especially with rigid conduit, since
        you might need to remove the BMS for service. The BMS should
        be at the bottom, in my opinion, for this reason. You can only
        run positive and negative battery cables out of the provided
        strain relief glands in free air, and it requires that the
        batteries be about 4 inches away from the wall. There is no
        suitable way to protect 100% of the battery cables.
      * Along the same lines, if you ever plan to expand the system,
        make sure you leave enough battery cable length to reach a
        higher level.
      * The lack of busbars is a really nice feature (until you get
        into larger systems).
      * The discharge rate supports the maximum input for a Sol-Ark
        15K with, I believe, just three batteries.
      * I love their "busbar pair" designed specifically for the
        Sol-Ark 15K. I order a pair with every inverter, regardless of
        what battery I am using (although I am not actively selling
        Sol-Ark right now).
      * You can't monitor the condition of individual batteries with
        Solar Assistant, or any other tool remotely to my knowledge.
        You can't even monitor the condition of paralleled stacks.
      * The "app" for the batteries is mind-bendingly useless – unless
        I'm really missing something.
      * For some firmware and hardware versions, over-the-air updates
        are not possible, and HomeGrid will need to send you an update
        tool. To be fair, I think this is also the case with EG4 and
        some other manufacturers.
      * Once we received a shipment where three of eight batteries
        were in the right boxes, but there were no guts in the
        batteries at all! It was just an empty steel battery shell. We
        had to send them back to our supplier. The boxes actually said
        13 Kg on the labels rather than 52 Kg, but nobody at the
        factory caught it. Strange.
      * HomeGrid Support is very competent, I would say among the best
        in terms of knowing their products inside and out, but it's
        50/50 whether I get someone on the phone or get a call back in
        a timely manner that allows me to complete a service call.
        They are willing to schedule assistance if you have an
        off-grid situation that requires help.


    Is this a vote for EG4? Not necessarily, but it's hard to argue
    with the price and the superior reliability/redundancy aspects of
    the LifePower4/LL batteries. One battery fault should not shut
    down an entire system unless there is a legitimate safety hazard.
    It's possible that these are UL issues that require
    system shutdowns, but EG4 appears to have overcome the problems
    I've seen with other manufacturers' products.

    Like others mentioned, I prefer to go with the 14.3 kWh / 16 kWh
    sealed batteries. I feel they have better build quality (other
    than my recent rant about rust on the MNP PowerFlo16), and keeping
    components sealed up better just makes sense to me, especially in
    challenging environments. Of course, if you want more modularity
    in terms of expansion options and less impact if a single unit
    goes down, 5 kWh units might be a better option. There is no right
    or wrong option, I guess – sometimes it just comes down to
    priorities, space, mounting options, and price.


    Jason Szumlanski
    Principal Solar Designer | Florida Solar Design Group
    NABCEP Certified Solar Professional (PVIP)
    Florida State Certified Solar Contractor CVC56956
    Florida Certified Electrical Contractor EC13013208


    On Tue, Sep 2, 2025 at 10:41 AM Christopher Warfel via RE-wrenches
    <re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org> wrote:

        Hi Wrenches, I went through the archives and read the
        comparison between
        these two.  The HomeGrid manual was in such a mess (or my pdf
        reader was
        defunct), that I started looking at other options. If anyone
        has a
        strong opinion of either of these two, or something better, I
        would
        appreciate.  We traditionally install small systems, and this
        would be
        one (@15kWh).  I would prefer to use a racking system with the
        BMS as
        part of the packaging. Solark 12kPV multimode.  Thank you, Chris

-- Christopher Warfel, PE
        ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
        PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
        (401) 447-5773

        _______________________________________________
        List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

        Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

        List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

        Change listserver email address & settings:
        http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

        There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't
        work, try the other:
        https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
        http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

        List rules & etiquette:
        http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

        Check out or update participant bios:
        http://www.members.re-wrenches.org


_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here:http://re-wrenches.org

List Address:RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

--
Christopher Warfel, PE
ENTECH Engineering, Inc.
PO Box 871, Block Island, RI 02807
(401) 447-5773
_______________________________________________
List sponsored by Redwood Alliance

Pay optional member dues here: http://re-wrenches.org

List Address: RE-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org

Change listserver email address & settings:
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/options.cgi/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

There are two list archives for searching. When one doesn't work, try the other:
https://www.mail-archive.com/re-wrenches@lists.re-wrenches.org/
http://lists.re-wrenches.org/pipermail/re-wrenches-re-wrenches.org

List rules & etiquette:
http://www.re-wrenches.org/etiquette.htm

Check out or update participant bios:
http://www.members.re-wrenches.org

Reply via email to