|
To follow up my questions on Views and in relation to
the other discussion about only saving certain values.
Is adding some mapping capability to the config xml
been discussed or planned?
Or does this little community prefer doing it's
mappings via Views?
I'm thinking about diving into the code to add support
for something like this in the config xml
<object name="SomeClass"
table="SomeTable">
<fields>
<field name="someID" column="ID"
/>
<field name="name"
column="some_name" />
</fields>
</object>
I thought I'd just float the idea here to see if this
has been discussed or tried already before jumping in with both
feet.
Thanks,
Ryan Miller
|
- Reactor For CF Object Relational Mapping Miller, Ryan
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mapping Jared Rypka-Hauer
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mapping Joe Rinehart
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mappin... Joe Rinehart
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Ma... Dave Shuck
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mappin... Jared Rypka-Hauer
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mapping Marlon Moyer
- Re: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mapping Tormod Boga
- RE: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mapping Michael Lantz
- RE: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mappin... Doug Hughes
- RE: Reactor For CF Object Relational Mappin... Tormod Boga

