Hey Chris, Glad it helped, but yeah, that's still a big hit - are you running Reactor in production mode?
That's <mode value="production" /> vs. <mode value="development" /> in Reactor.xml. Also, if you're using Model-Glue or Mach-II, be sure they're in "production" mode as well. -Joe On 2/9/06, Chris Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah yes... ;) > > I'm so used to running with debugging on, but normally I don't have a > couple of hundred lines in debug trace. > > A much more acceptable 200-300ms, I guess that's still probably a 10 > fold increase over a cfquery, but that's a fair trade off considering. > Maybe I'll use it as an excuse for an upgrade ;) > > Cheers, Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe > Rinehart > Sent: 09 February 2006 21:07 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Reactor For CF Performance > > Hey Chris, > > If you go into the ColdFusion administrator and turn off debugging and > report execution times, does it speed up significantly? > > -Joe > > On 2/9/06, Chris Blackwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm writing an image gallery app, and I have a simple many to many > > relationship for image to gallery. My app creates the gallery record > > then calls getImageArray(). In production mode, on a dual 3ghz xeon, > > which is not under any other load it takes 1500-1900ms to generate the > > page even when returning an empty array. Does this sound right? If > so, > > that's one hell of a performance hit over a neatly joined cfquery that > > would execute in a few milliseconds. > > > > Cheers, Chris > > > > > > > -- > Get Glued! > The Model-Glue ColdFusion Framework > http://www.model-glue.com > > > > > > -- Get Glued! The Model-Glue ColdFusion Framework http://www.model-glue.com
