RE: [Reactor For CF] Strange behaviour

[Doug Hughes]

Fixed and committed.  Honestly, I’m not sure if I just put a bandaid on a weird way to use the framework or not, but the example Jared gives below works now.   Doug   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jared Rypka-Hauer Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2006 8:54 PM To: reactor@doughughes.net Subject: Re: [Reactor For CF] Strange behaviour   Yeah, it would be a reasonable expectation. ;)   I can't confirm this is exactly what's happening internally, but I can say that the following example yielded an odd result:   <cfset rf = createObject("component","reactor.ReactorFactory").init("/commonInterest/config/reactor.xml")> <cfset User = rf.createRecord('User')>   <cfdump var="#User.load(email='[EMAIL PROTECTED]').getBuddiesIterator().getQuery()#" label="MyBuddies web-relevant" /> <cfdump var="#User.load(email='[EMAIL PROTECTED]').getBuddiesIterator().getQuery()#" label="MyBuddies cfobjective" />   What was that behavior? Well the second cfdump should have been dumping an empty query object, but it was dumping 2 rows, which is correct for the first CFDUMP. This led me to believe that load() method wasn't resetting the iterator... which wasn't a big deal for me at this point but could lead to some disastrous problems later on down the line... I've been crazy busy this week so I just didn't have time to report the bug.   Anyway, just to confirm that this was the problem, I tested with this code and it worked as expected:   <cfset rf = createObject("component","reactor.ReactorFactory").init("/commonInterest/config/reactor.xml")> <cfdump var="#rf.createRecord('User').load(email='[EMAIL PROTECTED]').getBuddiesIterator().getQuery()#" /> <cfdump var="#rf.createRecord('User').load(email='[EMAIL PROTECTED]').getBuddiesIterator().getQuery()#" />   Perfection.   Also, I've been working with the from and to attributes on the link tag and Doug, I gotta say: Good show. Works a treat and the speed imporvements have been fab.   The changes to the link tag enabled me to drop about 15 lines of custom code from my UserRecord object, reduced my object model by one type, sped the application up, and freed me up from having to instantiate a User that represented the other side of the link just to get to an iterator (the record itself was function-local, I was just instantiating it to get to the iterator it contained.)   Good stuff!   J   ------------------------------------------------ Jared C. Rypka-Hauer Continuum Media Group LLC http://www.web-relevant.com Member, Team Macromedia - ColdFusion   "That which does not kill me makes me stranger." - Yonah Schmeidler         On Apr 30, 2006, at 7:43 PM, Doug Hughes wrote: I suppose load on a record should reset its instance data Doug