On Wednesday 31 May 2006 14:57, Teddy Payne wrote:
> good read, having a safe save is just as important.  So having an exists()
> prior to trying to attemtpt an update is making more sense to me.

I'm not convinced Reactor should issue an exist() prior to calling update() 
(or even save() !). Mind you, Reactor currently does call exist() when you 
call save() on tables with non-auto inc. PK's, and uses that to switch from 
save() to update() (if I read XSLT right !).

isDirty and exists() check two different things.

I think it should just be something you can use if you want to check.

> So Tom, I am on the band wagon man!

Want some new XSLT templates ? :-)

-- 
Tom Chiverton

****************************************************

This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and 
Wales under registered number OC307980 whose registered office address is at St 
James's Court Brown Street Manchester M2 2JF.  A list of members is available 
for inspection at the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation 
to Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP. Regulated by the Law 
Society.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and may be 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee you must not 
read it and must not use any information contained in nor copy it nor inform 
any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee of its existence or 
contents.  If you have received this email in error please delete it and notify 
Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365 8008.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.

We are pleased to announce that Halliwells LLP has been voted AIM Lawyer of the 
Year at the 2005 Growth Company Awards



 

-- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List -- [email protected]
-- Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/



Reply via email to