On 11/8/06, Tom McNeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris,On 11/8/06, Chris Blackwell < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:As you have the table definition there is nothing stopping you creating
this table in a different database, and modifying it there? If you can
figure out what part of the definition causes reactor to go loopy (if
the definition is the cause) then it more likely someone will find a
solution.
Yes, I understand that. And that's why, in my last post, I said I would attempt to find the problem. But I'm not able to do that right now.
When I can, I'll do it and post the results.
But there are many people on this list who know a million times more about the inner workings of Reactor than I. And I hoped that one of them might be able to quickly look at the problem, look at the table structure, and see what was going on.
Since apparently that's not the case, I'll do what I said I'll do: solve the problem with a custom query now, and explore the problem further when I'm able. I'm not averse to working this out and contributing; but before I posted, I spent a considerable amount of time trying to find what was creating the problem. I didn't just run into a problem and send a post.
--
Thanks,
Tom
Tom McNeer
MediumCool
http://www.mediumcool.com
1735 Johnson Road NE
Atlanta, GA 30306
404.589.0560
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
[email protected]
Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
[email protected]
Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
