Hey,
No worries Byron.  I will send a mail reminder for myself for when I get home tonight.  We have all been there in the "not clicking" department of the store.

Teddy

On 7/24/06, Byron Raines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks, Teddy.  I'd appreciate it if you would send me a code snippet
when you can.  For some reason, it's just not clicking.

Byron

Teddy Payne wrote:
> I don't have my reactor code on me, but to get the address information
> I believe there is a method called _getParent() or getParent().  It
> should get the parent relationship object. _getParent() should get
> staff and then you can create call the iterator for the Addresses.
>
> I would give a code snippet, but that is on my system at home.
>
> Teddy
>
> On 7/24/06, *Byron Raines* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
>     Teddy,
>
>     I understand that.  I may not be explaining myself
>     correctly.  Maybe an
>     example.
>
>     Table:  Staff
>
>     StaffID: int
>     Staffrname: char(50)
>
>     Table:  Address
>
>     AddressID:  int
>     StaffID: int
>     Address1:  char(50)
>     State: char (2)
>
>     reactor.xml:
>     <object name="Staff">
>          <hasOne name="Address">
>              <relate from="StaffID" to="StaffID" />
>          </hasOne>
>     </object>
>
>     I want to display a list of staff and their address.
>
>     If I do:
>
>     <cfset StaffGateway = Reactor.createGateway ("Staff") />
>     <cfset qStaff = StaffGateway.getAll() />
>
>     I can list all the Staff but not their address info.  It seems I
>     cannot
>     access their Address info unless I create a query combining the two,
>     then do the "createGateway()" and "getAll().  My thinking was I should
>     be able to access the address info in the same way I access it on
>     a per
>     record basis.
>
>     I hope I'm explaining myself correctly.
>
>     Byron
>
>
>
>     Teddy Payne wrote:
>     > Sorting on Create Record?  Record factory objects are typically used
>     > to work with 1 record at a time.  A Gateway is for working with
>     > multiple records at a time.
>     >
>     > I am not trying to state the obvious or chastise, but does that make
>     > sense?
>     >
>     > Teddy
>     >
>     > On 7/24/06, *Byron Raines* < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>     >
>     >     Just trying to make sure I'm understanding this particular
>     thread.  I
>     >     have a table that has a "hasOne" relationship with another
>     table.  I
>     >     understand when doing a "CreateRecord" how the relationships
>     >     work.  It
>     >     looks like it does not work when doing a "CreateGateway".  Right
>     >     now, if
>     >     I want to display a listing, I have to create query joining
>     the two
>     >     tables with what I need, then do at getAll() -- by the way I
>     love
>     >     getAll(), it makes having sortable tables so easy.  I would have
>     >     thought
>     >     you would have the same relationship strategy as with Create
>     Record.
>     >
>     >     Am I understanding this correctly?
>     >
>     >     Byron
>     >
>     >     Doug Hughes wrote:
>     >     > Do you mean on gateways?  Yea.  Why wouldn't I?
>     >     >
>     >     > Doug
>     >     >
>     >     > -----Original Message-----
>     >     > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> [mailto:
>     >     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On
>     >     > Behalf Of Byron Raines
>     >     > Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 7:25 PM
>     >     > To: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     > Subject: Re: (LONG) Re: [Reactor for CF] SharedKey
>     >     >
>     >     > Doug,
>     >     >     Will this allow the use of getAll( ) for this situation?
>     >     >
>     >     > byron
>     >     >
>     >     > Doug Hughes wrote:
>     >     >
>     >     >> Chris,
>     >     >>
>     >     >> This will probably be depricated or removed in 2.0.  In 2.0 I
>     >     plan to
>     >     >>
>     >     > allow
>     >     >
>     >     >> you to define objects which extend beyond one table.  So, in
>     >     your case you
>     >     >> could define a consultant which is made up of the Consultant
>     >     and User
>     >     >> tables.  That should be easier than this shared key nonsense
>     >     and help
>     >     >> improve performance in general.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Doug
>     >     >>
>     >     >> -----Original Message-----
>     >     >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     >     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>     >     [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>>] On
>     >     >> Behalf Of Christopher Bradford
>     >     >> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 2:00 PM
>     >     >> To: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     >     <mailto: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     >> Subject: (LONG) Re: [Reactor for CF] SharedKey
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Results! :-)
>     >     >>
>     >     >> I tried the code in the docs and was completely shocked
>     to see
>     >     that it
>     >     >> worked. :-p Well, turns out that it didn't *really* work; it
>     >     only sort of
>     >     >> worked. The problem is when there is more than one hasOne
>     >     relationship
>     >     >> between to same two tables. For example:
>     >     >>
>     >     >> TABLE: User
>     >     >> ID int PK identity
>     >     >> sponsorID int FK to Consultant.userID
>     >     >>
>     >     >> TABLE: Consultant
>     >     >> userID int PK FK to User.ID
>     >     >>
>     >     >> In Reactor, User has two relationships to Consultant:
>     >     >>
>     >     >> <object name="user">
>     >     >>     <!-- Consultant is a User -->
>     >     >>     <hasOne name="consultant">
>     >     >>         <relate from="ID" to="userID" />
>     >     >>     </hasOne>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>     <!-- User has a Sponsor -->
>     >     >>     <hasOne name="consultant" alias="sponsor">
>     >     >>         <relate from="sponsorID" to="userID" />
>     >     >>     </hasOne>
>     >     >> </object>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> <object name="consultant">
>     >     >>     <!-- Consultant is a User -->
>     >     >>     <hasOne name="user">
>     >     >>         <relate from="userID" to="ID" />
>     >     >>     </hasOne>
>     >     >> </object>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> The question was where to put the sharedKey attribute.
>     The docs
>     >     say to put
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >> it on the consultant object. I did that (<object
>     name="consultant"
>     >     >> sharedKey="true">). My XML editor complained, because the DTD
>     >     doesn't
>     >     >>
>     >     > allow
>     >     >
>     >     >> for this, but ModelGlue worked. I was able to create a
>     >     consultant object,
>     >     >> get its user, set properties on both, and save. However,
>     I wondered
>     >     >>
>     >     > whether
>     >     >
>     >     >> Consultant was able to distinguish between the "is-A"
>     relationship
>     >     >> (Consultant is a User) and the "has-A" relationship (User
>     has a
>     >     Sponsor).
>     >     >> When I created a new Consultant object and set the Sponsor on
>     >     its User to
>     >     >> the previously created Consultant, Reactor overwrote the
>     >     initial record.
>     >     >> This suggests that putting the sharedKey on the object
>     tag does not
>     >     >> distinguish between different hasOne relationships.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> So, I moved the sharedKey attribute to the hasOne tag
>     inside the
>     >     >>
>     >     > Consultant
>     >     >
>     >     >> object (<hasOne name="user" sharedKey="true">). This
>     time, SQL
>     >     Server
>     >     >> complained about a foreign key violation. Turns out
>     Reactor was
>     >     saving the
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >> Consultant first, which won't work.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Finally, I moved the sharedKey attribute to the first hasOne
>     >     tag inside
>     >     >>
>     >     > the
>     >     >
>     >     >> User object (<hasOne name="consultant" sharedKey="true">) --
>     >     the one
>     >     >> representing an "is-a" relationship. This worked
>     perfectly. I
>     >     was able to
>     >     >> create a new Consultant, get its User, set properties on
>     both,
>     >     and set the
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >> Sponsor without overwriting the earlier records.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> So, it seems the best place is to put the sharedKey="true" in
>     >     the base
>     >     >> object's hasOne tag that refers to the extending object.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> I wonder whether it doesn't make just as much sense, and
>     would
>     >     be clearer,
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >> to add an "isA" tag in Reactor v2?
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Hopefully this is clear and helpful.
>     >     >>
>     >     >> Christopher Bradford
>     >     >> Alive! LLP
>     >     >>
>     >     >> ----- Original Message -----
>     >     >> From: "Doug Hughes" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>
>     >     >> To: < [email protected]
>     <mailto: [email protected]>
>     >     <mailto:[email protected]
>     <mailto: [email protected]>>>
>     >     >> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 7:27 AM
>     >     >> Subject: SPAM-LOW: RE: [Reactor for CF] SharedKey
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>> You know, this smells funny, doesn't it?
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> Chris - give it a try with the code in the docs.  If that
>     >     doesn't work
>     >     >>> move
>     >     >>> the shared key to the relationship (where it seems it
>     belongs)
>     >     and try
>     >     >>> that.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> Plz report back and let us know if the docs are fubared.
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>> Doug
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     >     -- -- -- --
>     >     >> -- --
>     >     >> Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto: [email protected] <mailto: [email protected]>>
>     >     >> Archives at:
>     >     http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     >     < http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/>
>     >     >> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     >     -- -- -- --
>     >     >> -- --
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     >     -- -- -- --
>     >     >>
>     >     > -- --
>     >     >
>     >     >> Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     >     >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     >> Archives at:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     >     >> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     >     -- -- -- --
>     >     >>
>     >     > -- --
>     >     >
>     >     >>
>     >     >>
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     >     -- -- -- --
>     >     > -- --
>     >     > Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     >     > [email protected] <mailto: [email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     > Archives at:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     >     > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     >     -- -- -- --
>     >     > -- --
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >     > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     >     -- -- -- -- -- --
>     >     > Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     >     > [email protected] <mailto: [email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>     >     > Archives at:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     <http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ >
>     >     > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     >     -- -- -- -- -- --
>     >     >
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>     >     -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     >     -- -- -- -- --
>     >     Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     >     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     <mailto:[email protected] <mailto: [email protected]>>
>     >     Archives at:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     >     -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     >     -- -- -- -- --
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     >
>     > --
>     > <cf_payne />
>     > http://cfpayne.wordpress.com/
>     > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- --
>     > -- -- -- --
>     > Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>     > Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     > -- -- -- --
>
>
>     -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- -- -- -- --
>     Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected] >
>     Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
>     < http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/>
>     -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
>     -- -- -- -- --
>
>
>
>
> --
> <cf_payne />
> http://cfpayne.wordpress.com/ <http://cfpayne.wordpress.com/>
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> -- -- -- --
> Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
> [email protected]
> Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
> -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
> -- -- -- --


-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
[email protected]
Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --




--
<cf_payne />
http://cfpayne.wordpress.com/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List
[email protected]
Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Reply via email to