Ah. Oops. Sorry! My foot is not tasty, but its placement it well deserved!
-Joe On 9/15/06, Peter Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Joe, My point exactly - follow the link and read the comments. http://www.dougboude.com/blog/1/2006/09/Responding-Appropriately-to-Question s.cfm Basically a comment of mine to the Reactor list had been used as an example of how some of us should take more time to write less technical responses for newer people. When I shortly thereafter saw Doug responding to my original technical comment basically saying "exactly - I agree" (with my technical comment), I couldn't help myself . . . (I promise that I will practice better impulse control in the future - I don't want to mess up the StoN ratio on what is a great list) In case it wasn't obvious, I think Doug H. has done an amazing job, is a great asset to the community and I am always astonished how much people like he and you (and Dave and Chris in CS and all of the other committers) invest in making all of our lives easier. If Doug posted his replies in technical Lithuanian, I'd take the time to go get it translated. It would be worth the effort. Sorry for any misunderstanding or anyone who might have thought I had anything other than the highest regard for Doug. His code is one of the first places I look whenever I'm trying to solve an interesting application generation problem. Best Wishes, Peter On 9/15/06 11:55 AM, "Joe Rinehart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter, > >> I appreciate your posting to the Reactor list, but you REALLY have to take >> the time to make your postings more comprehensive to people who don't have >> your depth of experience! > > Doug already takes plenty of time, unpaid time, working on community > contributions, making many high-level things easier for those without > his depth of experience. He phrased his response well, using terms > easily definable with a little research. To expect every post to > contain the evolution of procedural -> OO ColdFusion along with > definitions of the patterns provided by tools such as Reactor isn't a > realistic expectation, and it won't result in anyone bothering to > improve themselves. > > -Joe > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > -- > Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List > [email protected] > Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > -- > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List [email protected] Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
-- Get Glued! The Model-Glue ColdFusion Framework http://www.model-glue.com -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List [email protected] Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
