On 1/23/07, Doug Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the feedback. You'd never know it, but I'm actually working to get 1.0 out. And though I think you make a valid point there are already
Right-o! Sounds good, and props for the quality code, esse. Not many projects roll like this (I'm a MG:U head, so those two get some love too). Not too bloody of an edge! Yes, I feared it would be like turning the titanic at this point, and thus the 2.0 comment =]. I could write a converter if I wanted stuff organized like that, that bad. Some form of ANT script, I don't don't believe. \-; Out of my drive to know: does it not bother you, personally, or just too sweeping of a change? Ghastly thing to think about changing, neh? Do you generally work with databases with hundreds of tables? I guess more people would ask if table #s like that were common. And it depends on the DBMS, I reckon as well. Ah so. Gratzi for the feed-back on the feedback! And super-gratzi fer the component of MG:U that has helped organized my code the most*! *so far, as I haven't gotten too into ColdSpring, which has potential =] Rock on, :Denny -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List [email protected] Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
