Or even have a getConfiguration on the reactorFactory that does getObjectFactory().getConfig()?
Thanks, den -- I would rather be poor in a cottage full of books than a king without the desire to read. Thomas B. Macaulay On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:41 PM, denstar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Qasim Rasheed wrote: >> I do not have aceess to reactor code at this time but I believe that you can >> pass in a Reactor configured object during initialization of reactor factory >> instead of path to XML. Since we use ColdSpring, we configure that >> configuration object separately and pass it as a constructor-arg to the >> ReactorFactory. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ if you meant objectFactory, it sorta makes sense. =] > > Thanks Quasim, > > Is there any reason why we wouldn't want to stick the configured > configuration object in the variables scope of the reactorFactory > itself, and then return it with getConfiguration? > > :den > > -- > I shall not be satisfied unless I produce something which shall for a > few days supersede the last fashionable novel on the tables of young > ladies. > Thomas B. Macaulay > > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > -- > Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- > -- > > -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Reactor for ColdFusion Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/reactor%40doughughes.net/ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
