Eduardo Bellani: > Would you know if your sweet-expressions would work on PLT Scheme > (I'm reaching for some way to develop a web app with sweet expressions > here, just to show case it to a study group, perhaps get some > people interested)?
I don't know if it'd work on PLT Scheme, but if it doesn't, it should be extremely trivial to make it work. The Scheme implementation of sweet-expressions is intentionally written to be _very_ portable; I actively strived to avoid anything that wasn't explicitly promised by the Scheme (R5) spec. The one exception is modules, which R5 didn't have at all, so you may need to edit the (few) lines to cause it to be combined into a module. Nearly all Schemes have _some_ module system, but they're all slightly different :-(. The code I wrote (modulo reuse) uses a relatively small dialect of Scheme. I want it to be easily translatable to Common Lisp and ACL2, so I intentionally avoided some Scheme capabilities. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
