Kartik Agaram: > The solution doesn't make reference to SRFI. Have y'all already done > the inlining I was talking about?
Yes, at least I *tried* to. I stopped referring to the SRFI because we're not planning to implement exactly what the SRFI does, but instead, to implement a variant. For example, I think we're agreeing that using the word "group" is a mistake; all other Lisp abbreviations are punctuation, so having a word-only special syntax is odd. I think we're going to add SPLIT too. > I've been reading various documents with varying levels of staleness > and spiralling in on the project. But perhaps that is just the wrong > approach on my part. It's not insane. I just moved key material to the Wiki on readable.sourceforge.net, so some of the older material on "how did we get here" is necessarily elsewhere. Even if we don't agree with each other on some point, I think it's really valuable to see and discuss fresh perspectives. So I really appreciate that you're taking the time to read all this crazy material and discuss it. --- David A. Wheeler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Readable-discuss mailing list Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
