Beni Cherniavsky-Paskin <c...@users.sf.net>
> I was about to second "if in doubt, use nfx", but then thought of scheme
> varargs....
If you're truly defining *infix* operators, i.e., where at least two operators
are *required*, then my proposal *DOES* help. E.G., you can say in
sweet-expressions:
define {a + b . rest}
! implementation_here
Under this proposal, it translates to:
(define (+ a b . rest)
implementation_here)
--- David A. Wheeler
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Readable-discuss mailing list
Readable-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/readable-discuss
